Literature DB >> 11391625

Clinical relevance of genomic aberrations in homogeneously treated high-risk stage II/III breast cancer patients.

A Seute1, H P Sinn, R F Schlenk, R Emig, D Wallwiener, E M Grischke, S Hohaus, H Döhner, R Haas, M Bentz.   

Abstract

Little is known about the prognostic impact of chromosome aberrations in breast cancer. The aim of our study was to determine whether genomic aberrations of prognostic relevance can be identified in the context of a clinical study using molecular cytogenetics. Paraffin-embedded tumor samples of 44 patients with high-risk stage II/III breast cancer were analyzed by comparative genomic hybridization. All patients received identical therapy including dose-escalated chemotherapy followed by peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. The most frequent chromosomal aberrations were gains on chromosome arms 17q (24 cases), 1q (21 cases), 8q (17 cases), 20q (13 cases), 6p (9 cases) as well as losses on chromosome arms 13q (25 cases), 11q (20 cases), 5q (11 cases), 6q (11 cases), 9p (10 cases), 18q (10 cases), 8p (9 cases) and 16q (9 cases). In univariate analysis, the correlation with the clinical outcome revealed a higher risk for patients with tumors exhibiting 13q losses and a reduced risk for tumors exhibiting 16q losses (p = 0.020), 6q losses (p = 0.041) and estrogen-receptor positivity (0.051). In multivariate analysis using the Cox model, only the loss of 16q exhibited borderline significance (p = 0.065). These data show that comparative genomic hybridization can be performed in the context of a clinical trial. In our subgroup of high-risk breast cancer patients, chromosomal aberrations were valuable prognostic parameters. Copyright 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11391625     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.1296

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  14 in total

Review 1.  Chromosome 6p amplification and cancer progression.

Authors:  Gda C Santos; M Zielenska; M Prasad; J A Squire
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Integrated analysis of genome-wide copy number alterations and gene expression in microsatellite stable, CpG island methylator phenotype-negative colon cancer.

Authors:  Lenora W M Loo; Maarit Tiirikainen; Iona Cheng; Annette Lum-Jones; Ann Seifried; James M Church; Robert Gryfe; Daniel J Weisenberger; Noralane M Lindor; Steven Gallinger; Robert W Haile; David J Duggan; Stephen N Thibodeau; Graham Casey; Loïc Le Marchand
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 5.006

3.  Phosphatase 1 Nuclear Targeting Subunit Mediates Recruitment and Function of Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase 1 in DNA Repair.

Authors:  Feifei Wang; Songli Zhu; Laura A Fisher; Ling Wang; Nicholas J Eurek; James K Wahl; Li Lan; Aimin Peng
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  8p deletion is strongly linked to poor prognosis in breast cancer.

Authors:  P Lebok; A Mittenzwei; M Kluth; C Özden; B Taskin; K Hussein; K Möller; A Hartmann; A Lebeau; I Witzel; S Mahner; L Wölber; F Jänicke; S Geist; P Paluchowski; C Wilke; U Heilenkötter; R Simon; G Sauter; L Terracciano; R Krech; A von der Assen; V Müller; E Burandt
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 4.742

5.  Implication of snoRNA U50 in human breast cancer.

Authors:  Xue-Yuan Dong; Peng Guo; Jeff Boyd; Xiaodong Sun; Qunna Li; Wei Zhou; Jin-Tang Dong
Journal:  J Genet Genomics       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.275

6.  Transcriptomic landscape of breast cancers through mRNA sequencing.

Authors:  Jeyanthy Eswaran; Dinesh Cyanam; Prakriti Mudvari; Sirigiri Divijendra Natha Reddy; Suresh B Pakala; Sujit S Nair; Liliana Florea; Suzanne A W Fuqua; Sucheta Godbole; Rakesh Kumar
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  High resolution genomic analysis of sporadic breast cancer using array-based comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  Tara L Naylor; Joel Greshock; Yan Wang; Theresa Colligon; Q C Yu; Virginia Clemmer; Tal Z Zaks; Barbara L Weber
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 6.466

8.  Microarray-based comparative genomic hybridisation of breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  J-Y Pierga; J S Reis-Filho; S J Cleator; T Dexter; A Mackay; P Simpson; K Fenwick; M Iravani; J Salter; M Hills; C Jones; A Ashworth; I E Smith; T Powles; M Dowsett
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Multicolour-banding fluorescence in situ hybridisation (mbanding-FISH) to identify recurrent chromosomal alterations in breast tumour cell lines.

Authors:  A Letessier; M-J Mozziconacci; A Murati; J Juriens; J Adélaïde; D Birnbaum; M Chaffanet
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-01-31       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Elevation of SIPL1 (SHARPIN) Increases Breast Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Jason De Melo; Damu Tang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.