Literature DB >> 11391148

Total pelvic mesh repair: a ten-year experience.

E S Sullivan1, C J Longaker, P Y Lee.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This report describes our technique and experience in restoring the pelvic floor of females with pelvic organ prolapse.
METHODS: Total pelvic mesh repair uses a strip of Marlex Mesh secured between the perineal body and the sacrum. Two additional strips, attached to the first, are tunneled laterally to the pubis and support the vagina and bladder laterally. Candidates for the procedure have failed previous standard repair or manifest combined organ prolapse on physical and cystodefecography exams.
RESULTS: From January 1990 to December 1999, 236 females had total pelvic mesh repair, and 205 (87 percent) were available for follow-up. Median age was 64 (range, 32-89) years, median parity 2 (range, 1-9); 63 percent had birth-related complications. Bladder protrusion, vaginal protrusion, or both were the predominant chief complaint (54 percent), followed by anorectal protrusion (48 percent). Findings on physical examination showed degrees of prolapse of rectum (74 percent) and vagina (57 percent), perineal descent (63 percent), enterocele (47 percent), and rectocele (44 percent). Mean procedure time and length of hospital stay were 3.2 (standard deviation 0.75) hours and 6 (standard deviation 2.2) days, respectively. Reoperation rate because of complications of the total pelvic mesh repair procedure was 10 percent. Marlex erosion into rectum or vagina occurred in 5 percent of patients and constituted 46 percent of the complications requiring reoperation. Additional surgical procedures at various intervals subsequent to total pelvic mesh repair have been performed in 36 percent of patients to further improve bladder function and have been performed in 28 percent of patients to improve anorectal function. There has been no recurrence of rectal or vaginal prolapse to date. Reports of overall satisfaction for correction of primary symptoms for patients grouped into early (0.5-3 years), middle (>3-6 years) and late (>6 years) were 68 percent, 73 percent, and 74 percent respectively.
CONCLUSION: Total pelvic mesh repair is a safe and effective operation for females with pelvic organ prolapse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11391148     DOI: 10.1007/bf02234709

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  24 in total

1.  An ambispective observational study in the safety and efficacy of posterior colporrhaphy with composite Vicryl-Prolene mesh.

Authors:  Y N Lim; Ajay Rane; R Muller
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2004-09-25

2.  Sacrocolpopexy: is there a consistent surgical technique?

Authors:  Orfhlaith E O'Sullivan; Catherine A Matthews; Barry A O'Reilly
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  [Prolapse surgery].

Authors:  K P Jünemann; M Hamann; C Seif
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 4.  Surgical management of posterior vaginal wall prolapse: an evidence-based literature review.

Authors:  Christopher Maher; Kaven Baessler
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2005-04-19

5.  Complete pelvic floor repair in treating fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Patrick Y H Lee; Scott R Steele
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2005-02

Review 6.  The role of synthetic and biologic materials in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Ramon A Brown; C Neal Ellis
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2014-12

7.  Surgical techniques: robot-assisted laparoscopic colposacropexy with the da Vinci(®) surgical system.

Authors:  Catherine A Matthews
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2009-02-20

8.  Is there a role for concomitant pelvic floor repair in patients with sphincter defects in the treatment of fecal incontinence?

Authors:  Scott R Steele; Patrick Lee; Philip S Mullenix; Matthew J Martin; Eugene S Sullivan
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2005-08-02       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Treatment of obstructed defecation.

Authors:  C Neal Ellis
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2005-05

10.  Treatment of obstructed defecation.

Authors:  C Neal Ellis; Rahila Essani
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2012-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.