Literature DB >> 11389746

Transperineal 12-core systematic biopsy in the detection of prostate cancer.

M Kojima1, T Hayakawa, T Saito, H Mitsuya, Y Hayase.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The present study was designed to determine the clinical value of transperineal 12-core systematic prostate biopsy guided by transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) in the detection of prostate cancer.
METHODS: A total of 679 consecutive patients underwent systematic prostate biopsies because of abnormal results on digital rectal examination and/or TRUS and/or an elevated serum prostate-specific antigen level. Systematic six- and 12-core biopsies were taken in 138 patients between April 1994 and February 1995 and in the remaining 541 between March 1995 and February 2000, respectively. Twelve-core biopsy included two samples from the lateral portion of the peripheral zone and four from the anterior portion of the transition zone in addition to the conventional six-core biopsy.
RESULTS: In the series overall, systematic biopsy revealed 156 cases of prostate cancer (23.0%). The detection rate increased by 5.2%, although this was statistically not significant, from 18.8% (26/138) by six-core biopsy to 24.0% (130/541) by 12-core biopsy. Out of 130 patients in whom prostate cancer was detected by 12-core biopsy, it was supposed that conventional six-core biopsy would have missed 18 cases (13.8%).
CONCLUSIONS: Systematic 12-core biopsy might improve the detection rate for prostate cancer. However, further studies are needed to determine its clinical value in the diagnosis of the disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11389746     DOI: 10.1046/j.1442-2042.2001.00303.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Urol        ISSN: 0919-8172            Impact factor:   3.369


  10 in total

Review 1.  The results of transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Peng-Fei Shen; Yu-Chun Zhu; Wu-Ran Wei; Yong-Zhong Li; Jie Yang; Yu-Tao Li; Ding-Ming Li; Jia Wang; Hao Zeng
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 2.  Transperineal biopsy of the prostate--is this the future?

Authors:  Dwayne T S Chang; Benjamin Challacombe; Nathan Lawrentschuk
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Versus Transperineal Mapping Prostate Biopsy: Complication Comparison.

Authors:  Vassilios M Skouteris; E David Crawford; Vladimir Mouraviev; Paul Arangua; Marios Panagiotis Metsinis; Michael Skouteris; George Zacharopoulos; Nelson N Stone
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2018

4.  Temporal changes in the clinical approach to diagnosing prostate cancer.

Authors:  William M Hilton; Susan S Padalecki; Donna P Ankerst; Robin J Leach; Ian M Thompson
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2012-12

5.  Beyond diagnosis: evolving prostate biopsy in the era of focal therapy.

Authors:  J L Dominguez-Escrig; S R C McCracken; D Greene
Journal:  Prostate Cancer       Date:  2010-12-09

6.  Prostate Biopsy Using Transrectal Ultrasonography; The Optimal Number of Cores Regarding Cancer Detection Rate and Complications.

Authors:  Mahyar Ghafoori; Meysam Velayati; Mounes Aliyari Ghasabeh; Madjid Shakiba; Manijeh Alavi
Journal:  Iran J Radiol       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 0.212

7.  Comparison between transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsy for detection of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

Authors:  Jianxin Xue; Zhiqiang Qin; Hongzhou Cai; Chuanjie Zhang; Xiao Li; Weizhang Xu; Jingyuan Wang; Zicheng Xu; Bin Yu; Ting Xu; Qin Zou
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-04-04

8.  Optimal biopsy strategy for prostate cancer detection by performing a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Yi Wang; Jundong Zhu; Zhiqiang Qin; Yamin Wang; Chen Chen; Yichun Wang; Xiang Zhou; Qijie Zhang; Xianghu Meng; Ninghong Song
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 4.207

9.  Systematic 12- and 13-core transrectal ultrasound- or magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsies significantly improve prostate cancer detection rate: A single-center 13-year experience.

Authors:  Gong Cheng; Yuan Huang; Bianjiang Liu; Ruizhe Zhao; Pengfei Shao; Jie Li; Chao Qin; Lixin Hua; Changjun Yin
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 2.967

10.  Comparisons of cancer detection rate and complications between transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsy approaches - a single center preliminary study.

Authors:  Guan-Lin Huang; Chih-Hsiung Kang; Wei-Ching Lee; Po-Hui Chiang
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 2.264

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.