Literature DB >> 11384860

Selective DNA binding by the androgen receptor as a mechanism for hormone-specific gene regulation.

F Claessens1, G Verrijdt, E Schoenmakers, A Haelens, B Peeters, G Verhoeven, W Rombauts.   

Abstract

Steroid hormones control many physiological processes by activating specific receptors that act as transcription factors. In vivo, each of these receptors has a specific set of target genes, but in vitro the glucocorticoid, progesterone, mineralocorticoid and androgen receptors (class I receptors) all recognise response elements which are organised as inverted repeats of 5'-TGTTCT-3'-like sequences with a three nucleotide spacer. This poses the question how the in vivo specificity of the different steroid responses is mediated. To unravel the mechanisms involved, we have compared the structural features of the androgen-selective enhancers of the probasin, the secretory component and the sex-limited protein genes with those of non-selective enhancers in the mouse mammary tumour viral promoter and the C3(1) gene. The probasin promoter contains an androgen response element which is recognised with high affinity by the androgen receptor, but not by the other class I receptors. Swapping experiments between the DNA-binding domains of the androgen and glucocorticoid receptor revealed that it is not the first zinc finger, but rather the second zinc finger and part of the hinge region which contribute to this specificity. Three AR-specific aminoacids are involved in the probasin ARE recognition, but not in the C3(1) ARE binding by the AR. The location of these residues strongly suggests that an alternative dimerisation interface is involved in the probasin ARE binding. We could subsequently demonstrate that the AR binds direct repeats of 5'-TGTTCT-3'-like sequences in gel retardation assays as well as in transfection experiments. Moreover, the androgen-specific enhancers all contain direct repeats, and point mutations that change the nature of these elements into inverted repeats result in a change of specificity. It seems, therefore, that direct repeat elements can be the determinants of the AR-specificity. It will be exciting to learn how such DNA elements will affect the properties of the receptor dimer with respect to ligand binding, interactions between the aminoterminal domain and the ligand-binding domain, the recruitement of co-activators and cooperativity with other transcription factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11384860     DOI: 10.1016/s0960-0760(00)00154-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol        ISSN: 0960-0760            Impact factor:   4.292


  61 in total

1.  Comparative analysis of the influence of the high-mobility group box 1 protein on DNA binding and transcriptional activation by the androgen, glucocorticoid, progesterone and mineralocorticoid receptors.

Authors:  Guy Verrijdt; Annemie Haelens; Erik Schoenmakers; Wilfried Rombauts; Frank Claessens
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 3.857

2.  The program of androgen-responsive genes in neoplastic prostate epithelium.

Authors:  Peter S Nelson; Nigel Clegg; Hugh Arnold; Camari Ferguson; Michael Bonham; James White; Leroy Hood; Biaoyang Lin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-08-16       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  DNA recognition by the androgen receptor: evidence for an alternative DNA-dependent dimerization, and an active role of sequences flanking the response element on transactivation.

Authors:  Annemie Haelens; Guy Verrijdt; Leen Callewaert; Valerie Christiaens; Kris Schauwaers; Ben Peeters; Wilfried Rombauts; Frank Claessens
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 3.857

Review 4.  Chemistry and structural biology of androgen receptor.

Authors:  Wenqing Gao; Casey E Bohl; James T Dalton
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 60.622

5.  Marked variation in response of consensus binding elements for the Rta protein of Epstein-Barr virus.

Authors:  Lee-Wen Chen; Pey-Jium Chang; Henri-Jacques Delecluse; George Miller
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 6.  Dihydrotestosterone: Biochemistry, Physiology, and Clinical Implications of Elevated Blood Levels.

Authors:  Ronald S Swerdloff; Robert E Dudley; Stephanie T Page; Christina Wang; Wael A Salameh
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 19.871

7.  VEGFA rSNPs, transcriptional factor binding sites and human disease.

Authors:  Norman E Buroker
Journal:  J Physiol Sci       Date:  2013-10-06       Impact factor: 2.781

8.  Low-Dose Dihydrotestosterone Drives Metabolic Dysfunction via Cytosolic and Nuclear Hepatic Androgen Receptor Mechanisms.

Authors:  Stanley Andrisse; Shameka Childress; Yaping Ma; Katelyn Billings; Yi Chen; Ping Xue; Ashley Stewart; Momodou L Sonko; Andrew Wolfe; Sheng Wu
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 4.736

9.  Anoctamin 1 (TMEM16A) is essential for testosterone-induced prostate hyperplasia.

Authors:  Joo Young Cha; Jungwon Wee; Jooyoung Jung; Yongwoo Jang; Byeongjun Lee; Gyu-Sang Hong; Beom Chul Chang; Yoon-La Choi; Young Kee Shin; Hye-Young Min; Ho-Young Lee; Tae-Young Na; Mi-Ock Lee; Uhtaek Oh
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Nandrolone treatment decreases the level of rat kidney alpha(1B)-adrenoceptors.

Authors:  Staffan Uhlén; Jonas Lindblom; Anna Kindlundh; Paul Mugisha; Fred Nyberg
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2003-07-12       Impact factor: 3.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.