Literature DB >> 11384091

A national survey of the chemotherapy regimens used to treat small cell lung cancer (SCLC) in the United Kingdom.

R J Sambrook1, D J Girling.   

Abstract

Many chemotherapy regimens are used for treating SCLC in the United Kingdom, but it is not known, in any detail, which regimens are used, by which specialists, for which types of patient. We conducted a survey among all medical and clinical oncologists, respiratory physicians and general physicians with respiratory interest in the United Kingdom to find out. The questionnaire asked for the number of SCLC patients treated annually; how many were given chemotherapy; the drugs, doses and schedules chosen according to prognostic group (as defined by the clinician); and the reasons for choice of regimen. 1214 questionnaires were sent out, and responses were received from 1070 (88%) clinicians; 266 (25%) of these treated SCLC with chemotherapy. Of 4674 patients given chemotherapy annually, 36% were given it by clinical oncologists, 30% by medical oncologists, 27% by respiratory physicians, and 7% by general physicians. In all, 34 regimens were reported with 151 different combinations of dose and schedule. In 2311 good prognosis patients, 23 regimens were used, the commonest being ACE (doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, etoposide), ICbE (ifosfamide, carboplatin, etoposide), CAV (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine), CbE (carboplatin, etoposide), and PE (cisplatin, etoposide). In 1517 poor prognosis patients, 21 regimens were used, the commonest being CAV, EV (etoposide, vincristine), CbE, CAV alternating with PE, and oral etoposide. 452 patients were treated regardless of prognosis and for 219 no prognostic criteria were specified. The remaining 175 were given second-line chemotherapy or were given regimens chosen to avoid toxicity or because of intercurrent disease or other reasons. The main reasons affecting choice of regimen were routine local practice, patients' convenience, quality of life considerations, trial results and cost. The results show wide variation in routine practice and will be useful in reporting and planning clinical trials and in deciding on local treatment policies. Copyright 2001 Cancer Research Campaign.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11384091      PMCID: PMC2363653          DOI: 10.1054/bjoc.2001.1817

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  12 in total

1.  Improving survival without reducing quality of life in small-cell lung cancer patients by increasing the dose-intensity of chemotherapy with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support: results of a British Medical Research Council Multicenter Randomized Trial. Medical Research Council Lung Cancer Working Party.

Authors:  N Thatcher; D J Girling; P Hopwood; R J Sambrook; W Qian; R J Stephens
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  Treatment of small cell lung cancer: the state of the art.

Authors:  N Murray
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.705

3.  Five-day oral etoposide treatment for advanced small-cell lung cancer: randomized comparison with intravenous chemotherapy.

Authors:  R L Souhami; S G Spiro; R M Rudd; M C Ruiz de Elvira; L E James; N H Gower; A Lamont; P G Harper
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1997-04-16       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 4.  New drugs for treating small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  D S Ettinger
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 5.705

5.  Initial chemotherapeutic doses and survival in patients with limited small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  R Arriagada; T Le Chevalier; J P Pignon; A Rivière; I Monnet; P Chomy; C Tuchais; M Tarayre; P Ruffié
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-12-16       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Pretreatment prognostic factors and scoring system in 407 small-cell lung cancer patients.

Authors:  T Cerny; V Blair; H Anderson; V Bramwell; N Thatcher
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1987-02-15       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  Maintenance chemotherapy for anaplastic small cell carcinoma of the bronchus: a randomised, controlled trial.

Authors:  M Cullen; D Morgan; W Gregory; M Robinson; D Cox; D McGivern; M Ward; M Richards; D Stableforth; A Macfarlane
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.333

8.  Paclitaxel and carboplatin in the treatment of small-cell lung cancer patients resistant to cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and etoposide: a non-cross-resistant schedule.

Authors:  H J Groen; E Fokkema; B Biesma; B Kwa; J W van Putten; P E Postmus; E F Smit
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Duration of chemotherapy in small cell lung cancer: a Cancer Research Campaign trial.

Authors:  S G Spiro; R L Souhami; D M Geddes; C M Ash; H Quinn; P G Harper; J S Tobias; M Partridge; D Eraut
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Is there a case for cisplatin in the treatment of small-cell lung cancer? A meta-analysis of randomized trials of a cisplatin-containing regimen versus a regimen without this alkylating agent.

Authors:  J L Pujol; L Carestia; J P Daurès
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  9 in total

1.  A population-based study of gefitinib in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Kenji Hayashibara; Hiroaki Satoh; Yoko Shinohara; Masaharu Inagaki; Takayuki Kaburagi; Toshio Hashimoto; Koichi Kurishima; Hiroichi Ishikawa; Hideo Ichimura; Takeshi Nawa; Yasunori Funayama; Takeshi Matsumura; Katsunori Kagohashi; Takeshi Endo; Kinya Furukawa; Koji Kishi; Masaaki Sumi; Koichi Kamiyama; Shigemi Ishikawa
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 3.064

2.  Benefit from ifosfamide treatment in small-cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Huizhen Yang; Yun Ma; Zhida Liu; Zheng Wang; Baohui Han; Lijun Ma
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-11-25

3.  Bevacizumab-containing chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer patients: a population-based observational study by the Ibaraki thoracic integrative (POSITIVE) research group.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Nakamura; Hiroaki Satoh; Takayuki Kaburagi; Yoshihiro Nishimura; Yoko Shinohara; Masaharu Inagaki; Takeo Endo; Takefumi Saito; Kenji Hayashihara; Nobuyuki Hizawa; Koichi Kurishima; Takeshi Nawa; Katsunori Kagohashi; Koji Kishi; Hiroichi Ishikawa; Hideo Ichimura; Toshio Hashimoto; Yukio Sato; Mitsuaki Sakai; Koichi Kamiyama; Takeshi Matsumura; Koji Unoura; Kinya Furukawa
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 3.064

4.  S-1-containing chemotherapy for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: A population-based observational study by the Ibaraki thoracic integrative (POSITIVE) research group.

Authors:  Masaharu Inagaki; Yoko Shinohara; Takayuki Kaburagi; Takeo Endo; Shinsuke Homma; Nobuyuki Hizawa; Koji Kishi; Hiroyuki Nakamura; Kenji Hayashihara; Takefumi Saito; Koichi Kurishima; Hiroichi Ishikawa; Hideo Ichimura; Takeshi Nawa; Norihiro Kikuchi; Kunihiko Miyazaki; Takahide Kodama; Hiroaki Satoh; Kinya Furukawa
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-03-21

Review 5.  Chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Syed Mustafa Karim; Jamal Zekri
Journal:  Oncol Rev       Date:  2012-04-02

6.  Curative efficacy might be an early predictor of prognosis in patients with small cell lung cancer treated with 2 cycles of platinum-based first-line chemotherapy.

Authors:  Kaibo Zhu; Minlin Jiang; Yi Xu; Peixin Chen; Hao Wang; Jia Yu; Jun Zhu; Wencheng Zhao; Die Meng; Yayi He
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Phase III randomised trial of doxorubicin-based chemotherapy compared with platinum-based chemotherapy in small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  S Baka; R Califano; R Ferraldeschi; L Aschroft; N Thatcher; P Taylor; C Faivre-Finn; F Blackhall; P Lorigan
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Economics of the clinical management of lung cancer in France: an analysis using a Markov model.

Authors:  C Chouaïd; L Molinier; C Combescure; J P Daurès; B Housset; A Vergnenègre
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-01-26       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  The impact of cancer research: how publications influence UK cancer clinical guidelines.

Authors:  G Lewison; R Sullivan
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 7.640

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.