Literature DB >> 2540788

Duration of chemotherapy in small cell lung cancer: a Cancer Research Campaign trial.

S G Spiro1, R L Souhami, D M Geddes, C M Ash, H Quinn, P G Harper, J S Tobias, M Partridge, D Eraut.   

Abstract

A total of 610 patients with small cell lung cancer were entered into a randomised trial designed to assess the effect of duration of initial chemotherapy on survival. Patients were randomised to receive either four or eight courses of cytotoxic chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, vincristine and etoposide and also randomised to receive, on disease progression, either second line chemotherapy (methotrexate and doxorubicin) or symptomatic treatment only. In the whole study 196 (32.1%) had limited disease and 414 (67.9%) extensive disease. During initial chemotherapy the response rate (complete and partial responses) after four courses of treatment was 61% with no significant increase in patients receiving eight courses (63%). In those randomised to receive relapse chemotherapy the response rate was improved slightly for those who had originally received four courses of chemotherapy (25.6%) over those receiving eight (18.7%). The overall results show that of the four possible treatment randomizations, four courses of chemotherapy alone is inferior in terms of overall survival (30 weeks median survival) to the other three treatment options (39 weeks median survival, P less than 0.01). In patients responding to initial chemotherapy the disadvantage of four courses of chemotherapy alone was apparent (median survival of 40 weeks versus 49 weeks, P = 0.003) but not if drug treatment was given on relapse. The study shows that limiting treatment to four courses of chemotherapy alone is associated with inferior survival, but this is not the case if chemotherapy is given at relapse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2540788      PMCID: PMC2247136          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1989.117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  6 in total

1.  Radiotherapy in small cell cancer of the lung treated with combination chemotherapy: a controlled trial.

Authors:  R L Souhami; D M Geddes; S G Spiro; P G Harper; J S Tobias; B S Mantell; F Fearon; I Bradbury
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-06-02

2.  Tables of the number of patients required in clinical trials using the logrank test.

Authors:  L S Freedman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1982 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Etoposide (VP-16) and cisplatin: an effective treatment for relapse in small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  W K Evans; D Osoba; R Feld; F A Shepherd; M J Bazos; G DeBoer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Prognostic significance of laboratory parameters measured at diagnosis in small cell carcinoma of the lung.

Authors:  R L Souhami; I Bradbury; D M Geddes; S G Spiro; P G Harper; J S Tobias
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Maintenance chemotherapy for anaplastic small cell carcinoma of the bronchus: a randomised, controlled trial.

Authors:  M Cullen; D Morgan; W Gregory; M Robinson; D Cox; D McGivern; M Ward; M Richards; D Stableforth; A Macfarlane
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.333

6.  Prognostic factors in small cell lung cancer: multivariate model based on 778 patients treated with chemotherapy with or without irradiation.

Authors:  K Osterlind; P K Andersen
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 12.701

  6 in total
  27 in total

Review 1.  Lung cancer.

Authors:  R Souhami
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-05-16

2.  Treatment of relapse of small cell lung cancer in selected patients with the initial combination chemotherapy carboplatin, etoposide, and epirubicin.

Authors:  P Collard; P Weynants; C Francis; D O Rodenstein
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 9.139

3.  Quality-of-life assessment in small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  P Fayers
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Sequential chemotherapy in good-prognosis patients with small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  C J Twelves; J Goldman; C M Ash; R L Souhami; P G Harper; S G Spiro; D Geddes; J S Tobias
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 5.  Carcinoma of the bronchus 60 years later.

Authors:  G A Silvestri; S G Spiro
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 6.  [Updated strategies in Small Cell Lung Cancer post ASCO 2007].

Authors:  Stefan Hoschek; Ursula Hoschek-Risslegger; Michael Fiegl; August Zabernigg; Georg Pall; Thomas Auberger; Eberhard Gunsilius; Thomas Schmid; Herbert Jamnig; Wolfgang Hilbe
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2007

Review 7.  Etoposide. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in combination chemotherapy of cancer.

Authors:  J M Henwood; R N Brogden
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  Is the progress in cancer treatment results adequate or are we confronted with a more or less worldwide stagnation.

Authors:  K Karrer
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 9.  Duration of chemotherapy in small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  S G Spiro; R L Souhami
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 10.  [Small cell lung cancer].

Authors:  Stefan Hoschek; Ursula Hoschek-Risslegger; Michael Fiegl; August Zabernigg; Georg Pall; Thomas Auberger; Eberhard Gunsilius; Thomas Schmid; Herbert Jamnig; Wolfgang Hilbe
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.704

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.