Literature DB >> 11384071

A comparison of mammography spectral measurements with spectra produced using several different mathematical models.

E Wilkinson1, P N Johnston, J C Heggie.   

Abstract

Due to the relatively complex nature of spectral measurements from x-ray machines, many researchers use mathematical models to simulate the spectra they need. However, there is concern over their accuracy, and hence the impact that their accuracy may have, on subsequent calculations that rely upon the spectra modelled. With this in mind spectral measurements have been performed on a mammography machine and a comparison with spectra calculated using several different models is presented. Several different techniques have been investigated in the spectral measurements to allow for pulse pileup and other effects of high count rate. Comparison with half value layer (HVL) measurements shows that the use of a gating signal in conjunction with the air-free path provides accurate results without the need for a pinhole collimator. Comparison of the measured spectra with those calculated using different models proposed in the literature suggests that accurate results can be produced by all models, but only if the user attempts to match the calculated HVL of the modelled spectrum with the physically measured HVL. If this is not done the modelled spectra may be in error. The impact of such an error is demonstrated in calculations of mean glandular dose, which indicate a possible underestimate of the dose by up to 20%.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11384071     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/46/5/316

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  4 in total

1.  Experimental and Monte Carlo-simulated spectra of standard mammography-quality beams.

Authors:  M G David; E J Pires; M A Bernal; J G Peixoto; C E Dealmeida
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Segmentation-free x-ray energy spectrum estimation for computed tomography using dual-energy material decomposition.

Authors:  Wei Zhao; Lei Xing; Qiude Zhang; Qingguo Xie; Tianye Niu
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-06-30

3.  Generation and analysis of clinically relevant breast imaging x-ray spectra.

Authors:  Andrew M Hernandez; J Anthony Seibert; Anita Nosratieh; John M Boone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Dose comparison between screen/film and full-field digital mammography.

Authors:  Gisella Gennaro; Cosimo di Maggio
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 7.034

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.