Literature DB >> 11380352

Pain during mammography: implications for breast screening programmes.

F J Andrews1.   

Abstract

Pain experienced during mammography can deter women from attending for breast cancer screening. Review of the current literature on pain experienced during mammography reveals three main areas of interest: reports of the frequency of pain, identification of predictors of pain and strategies for responding to pain. Implications of this literature for breast screening programmes include the need for appropriate measurements of pain during mammography that are valid for screening populations, a further understanding of organizational factors involved in screening programmes that may be predictors of pain and for the development of valid strategies for responding to pain within breast screening programmes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11380352     DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1673.2001.00889.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Australas Radiol        ISSN: 0004-8461


  12 in total

Review 1.  Clinical practice. Mammographic screening for breast cancer.

Authors:  Suzanne W Fletcher; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-04-24       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Ethnic differences in decisional balance and stages of mammography adoption.

Authors:  Regina Otero-Sabogal; Susan Stewart; Sarah J Shema; Rena J Pasick
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2006-08-04

3.  Identifying Sociocultural Barriers to Mammography Adherence Among Appalachian Kentucky Women.

Authors:  Elisia L Cohen; Bethney R Wilson; Robin C Vanderpool; Tom Collins
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2015-02-10

4.  Self-compression Technique vs Standard Compression in Mammography: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Philippe Henrot; Martine Boisserie-Lacroix; Véronique Boute; Philippe Troufléau; Bruno Boyer; Grégory Lesanne; Véronique Gillon; Emmanuel Desandes; Edith Netter; Maryam Saadate; Anne Tardivon; Christine Grentzinger; Julia Salleron; Guillaume Oldrini
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 21.873

5.  Can Breast Compression Be Reduced in Digital Mammography and Breast Tomosynthesis?

Authors:  Greeshma A Agasthya; Ellen D'Orsi; Yoon-Jin Kim; Priyanka Handa; Christopher P Ho; Carl J D'Orsi; Ioannis Sechopoulos
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Mammography rates for 20 community-based family practices in Ontario: a full practice audit.

Authors:  J Graham Swanson; Janusz Kaczorowski
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct

7.  Can you use a sequential sample of patients as a substitute for a full practice audit?: Study of mammography screening rates in 20 family practices in Ontario.

Authors:  Graham Swanson; Janusz Kaczorowski
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.275

8.  Influence of the radiographer on the pain felt during mammography.

Authors:  M Van Goethem; D Mortelmans; E Bruyninckx; I Verslegers; I Biltjes; E Van Hove; A De Schepper
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-11-14       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  Interventions for relieving the pain and discomfort of screening mammography.

Authors:  D Miller; V Livingstone; P Herbison
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-01-23

Review 10.  Gynaecological aspects of the treatment and follow-up of transsexual men and women.

Authors:  S Weyers; P De Sutter; S Hoebeke; G Monstrey; G 'T Sjoen; H Verstraelen; J Gerris
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2010
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.