Literature DB >> 11380032

Practices and outcome of artificial cardiac pacing in 154 dogs.

M A Oyama1, D D Sisson, L B Lehmkuhl.   

Abstract

Artificial pacing (AP) is a treatment for symptomatic bradyarrhythmias unresponsive to medical therapy. This retrospective study was designed to define the practices and outcome of AP in dogs at 7 referral institutions participating in the Companion Animal Pacemaker Registry and Repository (CANPACERS). The indications, implantation techniques, complications, long-term outcome, and owner satisfaction were examined. One hundred fifty-four dogs were identified as undergoing AP from January 1, 1991, to January 1, 1996. Third-degree atrioventricular (AV) block (n = 91; 59%) and sinus node dysfunction (n = 45; 29%) were the most common indications for AP Transvenous endocardial AP systems were implanted in 136 dogs (88%), and epicardial systems were implanted in 18 (12%). Complications associated with AP were reported in 84 dogs (55%). Major complications occurred in 51 dogs (33%), including dislodgement of the pacing lead (n = 15; 10%), generator failure (n = 10; 6%), cardiac arrest during implantation (n = 9; 6%), and infection (n = 7; 5%). Minor complications occurred in 47 dogs (31%), including seroma formation (n = 18; 12%), muscle twitch (n = 17; 11%), and inconsequential arrhythmias (n = 15; 10%). Fourteen dogs (9%) experienced both major and minor complications. Survival analysis revealed 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates of 70, 57, and 45%, respectively. Age and presence of preexisting congestive heart failure (CHF) had a negative effect on survival (P = .001). Sixty percent of dogs with preexisting CHF died within 1 year of implantation, whereas 25% of dogs without heart failure died during the same period. Owners rated their satisfaction with the procedure as high in 80% of the dogs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11380032     DOI: 10.1892/0891-6640(2001)015<0229:aooacp>2.3.co;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vet Intern Med        ISSN: 0891-6640            Impact factor:   3.333


  7 in total

1.  Sick sinus syndrome in a dog: treatment with dual-chambered pacemaker implantation.

Authors:  Heather Burrage
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.008

2.  Complication rates associated with transvenous pacemaker implantation in dogs with high-grade atrioventricular block performed during versus after normal business hours.

Authors:  J L Ward; T C DeFrancesco; S P Tou; C E Atkins; E H Griffith; B W Keene
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.333

3.  Retrospective Analysis of Indications and Complications Related to Implantation of Permanent Pacemaker: 25 Years of Experience in 31 Dogs.

Authors:  Agnieszka Noszczyk-Nowak; Marcin Michałek; Karolina Kapturska; Adrian Janiszewski; Robert Pasławski; Piotr Skrzypczak; Urszula Pasławska
Journal:  J Vet Res       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 1.744

4.  2022 Update of the Consensus on the Rational Use of Antithrombotics and Thrombolytics in Veterinary Critical Care (CURATIVE) Domain 1- Defining populations at risk.

Authors:  Armelle deLaforcade; Lenore Bacek; Marie-Claude Blais; Corrin Boyd; Benjamin M Brainard; Daniel L Chan; Stefano Cortellini; Robert Goggs; Guillaume L Hoareau; Amy Koenigshof; Ron Li; Alex Lynch; Alan Ralph; Elizabeth Rozanski; Claire R Sharp
Journal:  J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio)       Date:  2022-05-02

5.  A retrospective review of 146 active and passive fixation bradycardia lead implantations in 74 dogs undergoing pacemaker implantation in a research setting of short term duration.

Authors:  Lynne E Swanson; Barbara A Huibregtse; Brian A Scansen
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 2.741

Review 6.  Indications for permanent pacing in dogs and cats.

Authors:  R A Santilli; F Giacomazzi; D M Porteiro Vázquez; M Perego
Journal:  J Vet Cardiol       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 1.701

7.  Single-Chamber Cardiac Pacemaker Implantation in a Donkey with Complete AV Block: A Long-Term Follow-Up.

Authors:  Markéta Sedlinská; Radovan Kabeš; Miroslav Novák; Filip Kološ; Pavlína Melková
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 2.752

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.