Literature DB >> 11379740

Influence of metacarpophalangeal joint position on basal joint-loading in the thumb.

M J Moulton1, M A Parentis, M J Kelly, C Jacobs, S H Naidu, V D Pellegrini.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Conventional wisdom holds that hyperextension of the metacarpophalangeal joint of the thumb is secondary to degenerative subluxation of the trapeziometacarpal joint as occurs in osteoarthritis. We propose that a hypermobile metacarpophalangeal joint may have a causative role in the development of primary osteoarthritis at the base of the thumb by concentrating forces on the palmar aspect of the trapeziometacarpal joint.
METHODS: Twenty fresh-frozen cadaveric forearm specimens were obtained post mortem from donors with no history of connective-tissue disease. Each specimen was categorized by its passive range of metacarpophalangeal joint motion. Testing was conducted with Fuji ultra-low-pressure-sensitive film while the hand was in the lateral-pinch mode with the metacarpophalangeal joint in each of the following positions: unrestrained, pinned in neutral, pinned in 30 degrees of flexion, and pinned in maximal hyperextension. Quantitative analysis of the trapezial contact surface at each of the metacarpophalangeal joint positions was performed, and the center of pressure was determined. Each specimen was then classified according to the extent of arthritic disease (nonarthritic, moderately arthritic, or affected by end-stage arthritis).
RESULTS: In specimens affected by end-stage osteoarthritis, the center of pressure on the trapeziometacarpal joint moved dorsally by 56.8% of the length of the trapezial surface with metacarpophalangeal joint flexions of 30 degrees (p < 0.01), whereas the corresponding values were 28.2% and 40.9% in the hyperextended and neutral metacarpophalangeal joint positions, respectively. In specimens with moderate osteoarthritis, 30 degrees of metacarpophalangeal joint flexion also produced the most dorsal trapeziometacarpal center of pressure (44.8%); however, this center of pressure was not significantly different from the centers of pressure at the other metacarpophalangeal joint positions. In nonarthritic specimens, the center of pressure was again significantly more dorsal with metacarpophalangeal joint flexion of 30 degrees than it was at the other positions (p < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: Metacarpophalangeal joint flexion effectively unloaded the most palmar surfaces of the trapeziometacarpal joint regardless of the presence or severity of arthritic disease in this joint.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11379740     DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200105000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  6 in total

1.  Diamond Stress View Radiograph for Thumb Metacarpophalangeal Hyperextension.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Marchessault; Michael C Knight; Paul A Henkel
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2017-12-22

Review 2.  [Injuries and posttraumatic osteoarthritis of the first carpometacarpal joint].

Authors:  A F Klenner; A H Towfigh; K Klenner
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  In vivo analysis of trapeziometacarpal joint kinematics during pinch tasks.

Authors:  Li-Chieh Kuo; Chien-Ju Lin; Guan-Po Chen; I-Ming Jou; Chien-Kuo Wang; Irina G Goryacheva; Marat Z Dosaev; Fong-Chin Su
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Kinematic Analyses of the Thumb during Simulated Posteroanterior Glide Mobilization.

Authors:  Meng-Tzu Hu; Ar-Tyan Hsu; Fong-Chin Su
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Increased range of motion and decreased strength of the thumb in massage practitioners with thumb pain.

Authors:  Si-hyun Kim; Oh-yun Kwon; Mi-ryung An; Yoon-shin Kim
Journal:  Ind Health       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 2.179

6.  A novel experimental design for the measurement of metacarpal bone loading and deformation and fingertip force.

Authors:  Szu-Ching Lu; Evie E Vereecke; Alexander Synek; Dieter H Pahr; Tracy L Kivell
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 2.984

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.