Literature DB >> 11379709

Bacterial contamination associated with electronic faucets: a new risk for healthcare facilities.

J Hargreaves1, L Shireley, S Hansen, V Bren, G Fillipi, C Lacher, V Esslinger, T Watne.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety of the hospital water supply following a major flood.
DESIGN: Surveillance was conducted of the hospital water supply as it entered the hospital and at randomly selected water faucets throughout the facility.
SETTING: A newly constructed surgical critical-care unit in a 265-bed community hospital that had to be evacuated and was out of operation for 6 weeks following a major flood of the city.
METHODS: Random water samples throughout the facility were analyzed for heterotrophic plate counts (HPCs), chlorine, and coliforms utilizing standard methods.
RESULTS: Water samples entering the hospital met appropriate standards, indicating the city water distribution system was not contaminated. Of 169 faucets tested, 13 (22%) of 59 electronic faucets exceeded the HPC threshold, and 12 (11%) of 110 manual faucets exceeded the HPC threshold (P<.14). A comparison of two brands of electronic faucets with manual faucets and with each other revealed that the HPC threshold was exceeded by 11 (32%) of 34 brand A faucets as compared to 12 (11%) of 110 manual faucets (P<.006). The HPC threshold was exceeded by 2 (8%) of 25 brand B faucets compared to 12 (11%) of 110 manual faucets (P<.94). Contamination rates of brand A and brand B faucets differed significantly (P<.003). Similar testing 2 months after hyperchlorination of the water supply indicated that the HPC threshold was exceeded by 16 (52%) of 31 brand A faucets compared to 10 (9.%) of 110 manual faucets (P<.0000003) and by 2 (18%) of 25 brand B faucets compared to 10 (9%) of 110 manual faucets (P=1.0).
CONCLUSIONS: A certain brand of electronic water faucet used in the hospital was associated with unacceptable levels of microbial growth in water and was a continuing source of bacteria potentially hazardous to patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11379709     DOI: 10.1086/501889

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol        ISSN: 0899-823X            Impact factor:   3.254


  6 in total

1.  Magnetic valves as a source of faucet contamination with Pseudomonas aeruginosa?

Authors:  Philippe Berthelot; François Chord; Franck Mallaval; Florence Grattard; Didier Brajon; Bruno Pozzetto
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-06-02       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  The role of the healthcare environment in the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms: update on current best practices for containment.

Authors:  Roy F Chemaly; Sarah Simmons; Charles Dale; Shashank S Ghantoji; Maria Rodriguez; Julie Gubb; Julie Stachowiak; Mark Stibich
Journal:  Ther Adv Infect Dis       Date:  2014-06

3.  Should electronic faucets be used in intensive care and hematology units?

Authors:  Jacques Merrer; Emmanuelle Girou; David Ducellier; Nicole Clavreul; Florence Cizeau; Patrick Legrand; Michel Leneveu
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-10-15       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 4.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa in premise plumbing of large buildings.

Authors:  Emilie Bédard; Michèle Prévost; Eric Déziel
Journal:  Microbiologyopen       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  [Requirements for hygiene in the medical care of immunocompromised patients. Recommendations from the Committee for Hospital Hygiene and Infection Prevention at the Robert Koch Institute (RKI)].

Authors: 
Journal:  Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.513

6.  Field Application of the Micro Biological Survey Method for a Simple and Effective Assessment of the Microbiological Quality of Water Sources in Developing Countries.

Authors:  Alyexandra Arienzo; Martin Sanou Sobze; Raoul Emeric Guetiya Wadoum; Francesca Losito; Vittorio Colizzi; Giovanni Antonini
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.