Literature DB >> 11376838

The aversion of broiler chickens to concurrent vibrational and thermal stressors.

S M. Abeyesinghe1, C M. Wathes, C J. Nicol, J M. Randall.   

Abstract

The requirement for assessing the effects of multiple concurrent stressors in improving the welfare of broiler chickens during transport has not been widely recognised. A discrete-choice technique was used to investigate the aversion of broiler chickens to concurrent vibrational and thermal transport stressors. In experiment 1, 12 female broiler chickens, aged 42+/-3 days were studied individually using two choice-chambers. Each chamber had four compartments connected via a central zone and offered four treatments; thermal (T: air temperature; 40 degrees C, 21% RH), vibrational (V: frequency; 2Hz, acceleration; 1ms(-2)), concurrent vibrational and thermal (VT) and no applied stressors (N). Coloured compartment wall panels, allocated at random, assisted chickens' identification of compartments. Birds were fasted overnight and were required to make five consecutive choices on each of four consecutive days. A choice was defined as entering a compartment and feeding (5g pellets), whereupon confinement for 60min was initiated. Choices were totalled over all birds and analysed using a log-linear generalised linear model. The vibration was significantly avoided (V and VT versus N and T; P<0.05) but the thermal stressor was not (T and VT versus N and V; P>0.05) and there was no interaction. In experiment 2, the procedure was repeated with 12 more birds and modifications to increase method sensitivity and maximise bird learning. Choices were more disparate than before with vibration avoided to a greater extent (V and VT versus T and N; P<0.01) but there was still no main effect of the thermal treatment or a significant interaction. Substantial differences between individuals were observed in both experiments. The overall response to vibration supported previous findings for short-term exposure, however, non-avoidance of the thermal treatment was unexpected. Possibly, the birds were unable to associate the delayed heat stress with the compartment. Alternatively, the thermal conditions were not perceived as aversive either initially or throughout the 60min confinement. The preference method provides a useful starting point for assessing combinations of stressors which affect broiler welfare, allowing relative ranking of treatments from an animal-centred perspective.

Entities:  

Year:  2001        PMID: 11376838     DOI: 10.1016/s0168-1591(01)00142-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Anim Behav Sci        ISSN: 0168-1591            Impact factor:   2.448


  7 in total

1.  Comparative vibration levels perceived among species in a laboratory animal facility.

Authors:  John N Norton; Will L Kinard; Randall P Reynolds
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.232

2.  Operation of an air filtration device results in morbidity and mortality in growing chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus).

Authors:  Todd J Pavek; Helen Valentine; Michele M Bailey
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.232

3.  Welfare of domestic birds and rabbits transported in containers.

Authors:  Søren Saxmose Nielsen; Julio Alvarez; Dominique Joseph Bicout; Paolo Calistri; Elisabetta Canali; Julian Ashley Drewe; Bruno Garin-Bastuji; Jose Luis Gonzales Rojas; Christian Gortázar Schmidt; Mette Herskin; Virginie Michel; Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca; Barbara Padalino; Helen Clare Roberts; Hans Spoolder; Karl Stahl; Arvo Viltrop; Christoph Winckler; Malcolm Mitchell; Leonardo James Vinco; Eva Voslarova; Denise Candiani; Olaf Mosbach-Schulz; Yves Van der Stede; Antonio Velarde
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2022-09-07

Review 4.  From Soundwave to Soundscape: A Guide to Acoustic Research in Captive Animal Environments.

Authors:  Fay E Clark; Jacob C Dunn
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-06-16

5.  Antioxidant and protective effects of Phytocee(™) against carbon tetrachloride-induced oxidative stress.

Authors:  Joshua Allan Joseph; Uma Radhakrishnan; Sridhar Mutyala; Krishnagouda Shankargouda Goudar; Usha Parackal Thachappully Ayyappan; Amit Agarwal
Journal:  J Nat Sci Biol Med       Date:  2015 Jan-Jun

6.  A Screen-Peck Task for Investigating Cognitive Bias in Laying Hens.

Authors:  Amanda Deakin; William J Browne; James J L Hodge; Elizabeth S Paul; Michael Mendl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Survey on broiler pre-slaughter mortality in a commercial abattoir of central Italy.

Authors:  Claudia Grilli; Roberta Stocchi; Anna Rita Loschi; Fabrizio Conti; Stefano Rea
Journal:  Ital J Food Saf       Date:  2018-11-06
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.