Literature DB >> 11376644

Investigating the visual span in comparative search: the effects of task difficulty and divided attention.

M Pomplun1, E M Reingold, J Shen.   

Abstract

In three experiments, participants' visual span was measured in a comparative visual search task in which they had to detect a local match or mismatch between two displays presented side by side. Experiment 1 manipulated the difficulty of the comparative visual search task by contrasting a mismatch detection task with a substantially more difficult match detection task. In Experiment 2, participants were tested in a single-task condition involving only the visual task and a dual-task condition in which they concurrently performed an auditory task. Finally, in Experiment 3, participants performed two dual-task conditions, which differed in the difficulty of the concurrent auditory task. Both the comparative search task difficulty (Experiment 1) and the divided attention manipulation (Experiments 2 and 3) produced strong effects on visual span size.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11376644     DOI: 10.1016/s0010-0277(01)00123-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  10 in total

1.  The effects of circadian phase, time awake, and imposed sleep restriction on performing complex visual tasks: evidence from comparative visual search.

Authors:  Marc Pomplun; Edward J Silva; Joseph M Ronda; Sean W Cain; Mirjam Y Münch; Charles A Czeisler; Jeanne F Duffy
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Route planning with transportation network maps: an eye-tracking study.

Authors:  Elise Grison; Valérie Gyselinck; Jean-Marie Burkhardt; Jan Malte Wiener
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-08-01

3.  Developmental changes in infants' visual short-term memory for location.

Authors:  Lisa M Oakes; Karinna B Hurley; Shannon Ross-Sheehy; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-12-18

4.  Simulating simultanagnosia: spatially constricted vision mimics local capture and the global processing deficit.

Authors:  Kirsten A Dalrymple; Walter F Bischof; David Cameron; Jason J S Barton; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  An augmented-reality edge enhancement application for Google Glass.

Authors:  Alex D Hwang; Eli Peli
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.973

6.  Effects of peripheral visual field loss on eye movements during visual search.

Authors:  Emily Wiecek; Louis R Pasquale; Jozsef Fiser; Steven Dakin; Peter J Bex
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-11-05

7.  The effects of age and cognitive load on peripheral-detection performance.

Authors:  Steven W Savage; Lauren P Spano; Alex R Bowers
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Developmental changes in visual short-term memory in infancy: evidence from eye-tracking.

Authors:  Lisa M Oakes; Heidi A Baumgartner; Frederick S Barrett; Ian M Messenger; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-10-02

9.  Blur Detection is Unaffected by Cognitive Load.

Authors:  Lester C Loschky; Ryan V Ringer; Aaron P Johnson; Adam M Larson; Mark Neider; Arthur F Kramer
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2014-03-14

10.  Toward FRP-Based Brain-Machine Interfaces-Single-Trial Classification of Fixation-Related Potentials.

Authors:  Andrea Finke; Kai Essig; Giuseppe Marchioro; Helge Ritter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.