Literature DB >> 11376271

Nonpalpable breast cancer: percutaneous diagnosis with 11- and 8-gauge stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy devices.

R F Brem1, J M Schoonjans, S N Goodman, A Nolten, F B Askin, O M Gatewood.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the accuracy of diagnosis of invasive breast cancer with 11- and 8-gauge stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy (SVAB) devices and to correlate lesion diameter and accuracy of breast cancer diagnosis at SVAB.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: During a 22-month period, 489 SVAB procedures were performed with an 11-gauge probe and 305 with an 8-gauge probe. SVAB and surgical pathologic results of 104 breast carcinomas were reviewed and correlated with lesion size, number of specimens obtained, and type of SVAB probe used.
RESULTS: Four of 38 ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) lesions diagnosed with 11-gauge SVAB demonstrated invasion at surgery, whereas one of 23 DCIS lesions diagnosed with 8-gauge SVAB demonstrated invasion at surgery (P =.6). A mean of 12 specimens per lesion were obtained in each group. In lesions 30 mm or larger, the underestimation rate for DCIS was 43% (three of seven) with 11-gauge SVAB and 17% (one of six) with 8-gauge SVAB (P =.6). Overall, the rate of underestimation for DCIS was significantly higher in lesions 30 mm or larger (four of 13) than in smaller lesions (one of 48, P =.006).
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated no difference in breast cancer diagnosis with the 8- and 11-gauge SVAB systems, but the accuracy of breast cancer diagnosis was greater in lesions smaller than 30 mm than in larger lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11376271     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.219.3.r01jn34793

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  12 in total

1.  Ductal carcinoma in situ on digital mammography versus digital breast tomosynthesis: rates and predictors of pathologic upgrade.

Authors:  Geunwon Kim; Peter G Mikhael; Tawakalitu O Oseni; Manisha Bahl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Stereotactic and ultrasound-guided breast biopsy.

Authors:  T H Helbich; W Matzek; M H Fuchsjäger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-11-13       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  CAD for mammography: the technique, results, current role and further developments.

Authors:  Ansgar Malich; Dorothee R Fischer; Joachim Böttcher
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-01-17       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  An overview of assessment of prognostic and predictive factors in breast cancer needle core biopsy specimens.

Authors:  E A Rakha; I O Ellis
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2007-07-14       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  A comparison of diagnostic performance of vacuum-assisted biopsy and core needle biopsy for breast microcalcification: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xu Chen Huang; Xu Hua Hu; Xiao Ran Wang; Chao Xi Zhou; Fei Fei Wang; Shan Yang; Gui Ying Wang
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 1.568

6.  Intraoperative ultrasonographically guided excisional biopsy or vacuum-assisted core needle biopsy for nonpalpable breast lesions.

Authors:  Shin-Cheh Chen; Horng-Ren Yang; Tsann-Long Hwang; Miin-Fu Chen; Yun-Chung Cheung; Swei Hsueh
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Predictive factors for invasive cancer in surgical specimens following an initial diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ after stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in microcalcification-only lesions.

Authors:  Hatice Gümüş; Philippa Mills; David Fish; Metehan Gümüş; Karina Cox; Haresh Devalia; Sue Jones; Peter Jones; Ali R Sever
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.630

8.  Do Eligibility Criteria for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS) Active Surveillance Trials Identify Patients at Low Risk for Upgrade to Invasive Carcinoma?

Authors:  Tawakalitu O Oseni; Barbara L Smith; Constance D Lehman; Charmi A Vijapura; Niveditha Pinnamaneni; Manisha Bahl
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-05-16       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Stereotactic biopsy of the breast using a decubitus table: comparison of histologic underestimation rates between 11- and 8-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy.

Authors:  Kyoung Eun Lee; Hak Hee Kim; Hee Jung Shin; Joo Hee Cha
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2013-10-22

10.  Is zero underestimation feasible? Extended Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy in solid lesions - a blind study.

Authors:  George C Zografos; Flora Zagouri; Theodoros N Sergentanis; Dimitra Koulocheri; Afroditi Nonni; Vassiliki Oikonomou; Philip Domeyer; Maria Kotsani; Constantine Fotiadis; John Bramis
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-05-14       Impact factor: 2.754

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.