Literature DB >> 18203289

Biliary brush cytology: factors associated with positive yields on biliary brush cytology.

Nasim Mahmoudi1, Robert Enns, Jack Amar, Jaber AlAli, Eric Lam, Jennifer Telford.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the yield of brushing biliary strictures and the factors associated with a positive result in biliary strictures.
METHODS: Data on all consecutive patients (01/02-10/05) who were identified to have a biliary stricture and who underwent biliary brush cytology were collected. The yield of positive biliary brush cytology was evaluated and compared to results with the gold standard for diagnosis (defined as either definitive surgical histology or clinical course). Additionally, associated factors of positive results including stricture location, gender, age, mass size, length of stricture, and dilatation prior to brushing cytology were assessed.
RESULTS: From 199 patients who had brushing cytology samples (10 patients were excluded due to lack of gold standard diagnosis), 77 patients had positive brushing cytology (yield 41%). Variables associated with positive cytology brushing on initial endoscopic retrograde cholangiography were age 1.02 (1.00-1.05), mass size>1 cm 2.22 (1.01-4.89) and length of stricture>1 cm 3.49 (1.18-10.2). The sensitivity of biliary brushing was 61%, its specificity 98%, the positive predictive value reached 99%, and the negative predictive value was 57%.
CONCLUSION: Our results revealed a 41% positive yield from brushing cytology. The sensitivity of biliary brushing cytology in our center was 61% and the specificity was 98%. Predictors of positive yield include older age, mass size>1 cm, and stricture length of >1 cm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18203289      PMCID: PMC2681148          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.14.569

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  30 in total

1.  A prospective controlled study comparing brush and bile exfoliative cytology for diagnosing bile duct strictures.

Authors:  T Kurzawinski; A Deery; J Dooley; R Dick; K Hobbs; B Davidson
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Analysis of false-negative diagnoses on endoscopic brush cytology of biliary and pancreatic duct strictures: the experience at 2 university hospitals.

Authors:  R Logrono; D F Kurtycz; C P Molina; V A Trivedi; J Y Wong; K P Block
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.534

3.  Brush cytology and the diagnosis of pancreaticobiliary malignancy during ERCP.

Authors:  John G Lee
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Triple-tissue sampling at ERCP in malignant biliary obstruction.

Authors:  J Jailwala; E L Fogel; S Sherman; K Gottlieb; J Flueckiger; L G Bucksot; G A Lehman
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Tissue sampling from the common bile duct through endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, endoscopic papillo(sphinctero)tomy and drainage in juxtapapillary malignancies.

Authors:  V Pugliese; D Barone; S Saccomanno; M Conio; H Aste; L Santi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Brush cytology of ductal strictures during ERCP.

Authors:  E Macken; M Drijkoningen; E Van Aken; W Van Steenbergen
Journal:  Acta Gastroenterol Belg       Date:  2000 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.316

7.  Endoscopic retrograde wire-guided brush cytology for diagnosis of patients with malignant obstruction of the bile duct.

Authors:  P G Foutch; D M Kerr; J R Harlan; R K Manne; T D Kummet; R A Sanowski
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  A prospective, controlled analysis of endoscopic cytotechniques for diagnosis of malignant biliary strictures.

Authors:  P G Foutch; D M Kerr; J R Harlan; T D Kummet
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Prospective evaluation of brush cytology of biliary strictures during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  B Glasbrenner; M Ardan; W Boeck; G Preclik; P Möller; G Adler
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 10.093

10.  Cytologic brushings of ductal lesions during ERCP.

Authors:  M E Ryan
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1991 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 9.427

View more
  17 in total

1.  Utilization of ancillary studies in the cytologic diagnosis of biliary and pancreatic lesions: the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology guidelines for pancreatobiliary cytology.

Authors:  Lester J Layfield; Hormoz Ehya; Armando C Filie; Ralph H Hruban; Nirag Jhala; Loren Joseph; Philippe Vielh; Martha B Pitman
Journal:  Diagn Cytopathol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.582

2.  Cholangioscopy Biopsies Improve Detection of Cholangiocarcinoma When Combined with Cytology and FISH, but Not in Patients with PSC.

Authors:  Karan Kaura; Tarek Sawas; Fateh Bazerbachi; Andrew C Storm; John A Martin; Gregory J Gores; Barham K Abu Dayyeh; Mark D Topazian; Michael J Levy; Bret T Petersen; Vinay Chandrasekhara
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  The Significance of p53 and K-ras Immunocytochemical Staining in the Diagnosis of Malignant Biliary Obstruction by Brush Cytology during ERCP.

Authors:  Young Sup Kim; Ho Gak Kim; Jimin Han; Change Jae Hur; Byeong Suk Kim; Jin Tae Jung; Joong Goo Kwon; Eun Young Kim; Chang-Ho Cho; Yoon Kyung Sohn
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 4.519

4.  The Detection of Cholangiocarcinoma in Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis Patients: Single Center Experience.

Authors:  Ufuk Barış Kuzu; Bülent Ödemiş; Nuretdin Suna; Hakan Yıldız; Erkan Parlak; Selçuk Dişibeyaz; Serkan Torun; Muhammet Yener Akpınar; Orhan Coşkun; Nesrin Turhan; Mahmut Yüksel; Ertuğrul Kayaçetin
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2016-03

5.  The diagnostic value of brush cytology alone and in combination with tumor markers in pancreaticobiliary strictures.

Authors:  Ufuk Barış Kuzu; Bülent Ödemiş; Nesrin Turhan; Erkan Parlak; Selçuk Dişibeyaz; Nuretdin Suna; Erkin Öztaş; Muhammet Yener Akpınar; Adem Aksoy; Serkan Torun; Hakan Yıldız; Ertuğrul Kayaçetin
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 2.260

6.  The impact of brush cytology from endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) on patient management at a UK teaching hospital.

Authors:  Rajiv Sethi; Kaushiki Singh; Ben Warner; Ula Mahadeva; Mark Wilkinson
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-10-29

7.  Outcomes of Different Methods for Analysis of Biliary Brush Cytology and of Factors Associated with Positive Diagnosis in an Age-Dependent Retrospective Review.

Authors:  Mariana Costa; Jorge Canena; Luís Mascarenhas-Lemos; Rafaela Loureiro; Mário Silva; Diana Carvalho; Tiago Capela; Pedro Russo; Gonçalo Ramos; António Mateus-Dias; Mário Ferraz-Oliveira; Pedro Mota Veiga; João Coimbra
Journal:  GE Port J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-02-28

8.  Role of biliary tract cytology in the evaluation of extrahepatic cholestatic jaundice.

Authors:  Mamta Gupta; Radha R Pai; Devi Dileep; Sandeep Gopal; Suresh Shenoy
Journal:  J Cytol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.000

9.  Utilization of ancillary studies in the cytologic diagnosis of biliary and pancreatic lesions: The Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology Guidelines.

Authors:  Lester J Layfield; Hormoz Ehya; Armando C Filie; Ralph H Hruban; Nirag Jhala; Loren Joseph; Philippe Vielh; Martha B Pitman
Journal:  Cytojournal       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 2.091

10.  An Investigation on the Results of Cytopathologic Tests of Pancreatobiliary System Performed in the Pathology Department in Iran.

Authors:  Afshin Moradi; Amir Sadeghi; Hamid Asadzadeh Aghdaei; Tahmineh Mollasharifi; Mahsa Ahadi; Elena Jamali; Afsoon Taghavi; Nasim Foroozandeh Shahraki; Arsham Moradi
Journal:  Iran J Pathol       Date:  2021-05-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.