Literature DB >> 11375835

Remifentanil- and fentanyl-based anesthesia for intraoperative monitoring of somatosensory evoked potentials.

S K Samra1, E A Dy, K B Welch, L K Lovely, G P Graziano.   

Abstract

We sought to compare effects of remifentanil- and fentanyl-based anesthesia on the morphology of somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) and speed of recovery from anesthesia. Forty-one patients undergoing spinal surgery and requiring intraoperative monitoring of SSEPs were randomized into two groups. In Group 1, anesthesia was induced with sodium thiopental and maintained with fentanyl, 50% nitrous oxide in oxygen, and 0.5%--0.75% isoflurane. In Group 2, anesthesia was induced with sodium thiopental and maintained with remifentanil, 50% oxygen in air, and 0.5%--0.75% isoflurane. The variables compared included hemodynamic changes during the induction and intubation, the interval from the end of anesthesia to extubation, intraoperative blood loss and fluid administration, and changes in latency and amplitude of the P37--N45 component of posterior tibial nerve somatosensory evoked potentials and the N20--P24 component of median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials. The two groups were matched for demographics, ASA physical status, and duration of surgery. Hemodynamic profiles after the induction and intubation were similar. There were significant differences between groups in time intervals from the end of anesthesia to extubation (15.3 +/- 12.8 vs 5.3 +/- 2.3 min; P = 0.0001) and ability to follow verbal commands (14.6 +/- 11.9 vs 4.5 +/- 2.4 min; P = 0.0001), with the Remifentanil group showing earlier recovery. Variability (coefficient of variation) of P37--N45 latency was greater (0.026 vs 0.014; P = 0.001) in the Fentanyl group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11375835     DOI: 10.1097/00000539-200106000-00031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  6 in total

Review 1.  [Intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring with evoked potentials].

Authors:  R Nitzschke; N Hansen-Algenstaedt; J Regelsberger; A E Goetz; M S Goepfert
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Somatosensory Evoked Potentials suppression due to remifentanil during spinal operations; a prospective clinical study.

Authors:  Irene Asouhidou; Vasilios Katsaridis; Georgios Vaidis; Polimnia Ioannou; Panagiotis Givissis; Anastasios Christodoulou; Georgios Georgiadis
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2010-05-12

3.  Remifentanil infusion as a modality for opioid-based anaesthesia in paediatric practice.

Authors:  Ahmed Mostafa Abdel Hamid; Ashraf Fawzy Abo Shady; Ehab S Abdel Azeem
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2010-07

4.  The effects of propofol, small-dose isoflurane, and nitrous oxide on cortical somatosensory evoked potential and bispectral index monitoring in adolescents undergoing spinal fusion.

Authors:  Anthony J Clapcich; Ronald G Emerson; David P Roye; Hui Xie; Edward J Gallo; Kathy C Dowling; Brian Ramnath; Eric J Heyer
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 6.627

5.  Effects of Dexmedetomidine on motor- and somatosensory-evoked potentials in patients with thoracic spinal cord tumor: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Yan Li; Lingzhong Meng; Yuming Peng; Hui Qiao; Lanjun Guo; Ruquan Han; Adrian W Gelb
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 2.217

6.  A Loading Dose of Dexmedetomidine With Constant Infusion Inhibits Intraoperative Neuromonitoring During Thoracic Spinal Decompression Surgery: A Randomized Prospective Study.

Authors:  Tun Liu; Yue Qin; Huaguang Qi; Zhenguo Luo; Liang Yan; Pengfei Yu; Buhuai Dong; Songchuan Zhao; Xucai Wu; Zhen Chang; Zhian Liu; Xuemei Liu; Tao Yuan; Houkun Li; Li Xiao; Gang Wang
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 5.810

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.