Literature DB >> 19846461

Juvenile sparrows preferentially eavesdrop on adult song interactions.

Christopher N Templeton1, Caglar Akçay, S Elizabeth Campbell, Michael D Beecher.   

Abstract

Recent research has demonstrated that bird song learning is influenced by social factors, but so far has been unable to isolate the particular social variables central to the learning process. Here we test the hypothesis that eavesdropping on singing interactions of adults is a key social event in song learning by birds. In a field experiment, we compared the response of juvenile male song sparrows (Melospiza melodia) to simulated adult counter-singing versus simulated solo singing. We used radio telemetry to follow the movements of each focal bird and assess his response to each playback trial. Juveniles approached the playback speakers when exposed to simulated interactive singing of two song sparrows, but not when exposed to simulated solo singing of a single song sparrow, which in fact they treated similar to heterospecific singing. Although the young birds approached simulated counter-singing, neither did they approach closely, nor did they vocalize themselves, suggesting that the primary function of approach was to permit eavesdropping on these singing interactions. These results indicate that during the prime song-learning phase, juvenile song sparrows are attracted to singing interactions between adults but not to singing by a single bird and suggest that singing interactions may be particularly powerful song-tutoring events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19846461      PMCID: PMC2842648          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2009.1491

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  16 in total

1.  Female eavesdropping on male song contests in songbirds.

Authors:  Daniel J Mennill; Laurene M Ratcliffe; Peter T Boag
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-05-03       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Learning words through overhearing.

Authors:  N Akhtar; J Jipson; M A Callanan
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr

Review 3.  What songbirds teach us about learning.

Authors:  Michael S Brainard; Allison J Doupe
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-05-16       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Functional aspects of song learning in songbirds.

Authors:  Michael D Beecher; Eliot A Brenowitz
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2005-01-12       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  Recognition of other species' aerial alarm calls: speaking the same language or learning another?

Authors:  Robert D Magrath; Benjamin J Pitcher; Janet L Gardner
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Constrained performance in a communication network: implications for the function of song-type matching and for the evolution of multiple ornaments.

Authors:  David M Logue; Wolfgang Forstmeier
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.926

7.  Children learn from speech not addressed to them: the case of personal pronouns.

Authors:  Y Oshima-Takane
Journal:  J Child Lang       Date:  1988-02

8.  Territory tenure in song sparrows is related to song sharing with neighbours, but not to repertoire size.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.844

Review 9.  Learned birdsong and the neurobiology of human language.

Authors:  Erich D Jarvis
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.691

10.  Social information trumps vegetation structure in breeding-site selection by a migrant songbird.

Authors:  Matthew G Betts; Adam S Hadley; Nicholas Rodenhouse; Joseph J Nocera
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Experimental identification of social learning in wild animals.

Authors:  Simon M Reader; Dora Biro
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 2.  You talkin' to me? Interactive playback is a powerful yet underused tool in animal communication research.

Authors:  Stephanie L King
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 3.  Vocal matching: the what, the why and the how.

Authors:  Stephanie L King; Peter K McGregor
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Spatial movements and social networks in juvenile male song sparrows.

Authors:  Christopher N Templeton; Veronica A Reed; S Elizabeth Campbell; Michael D Beecher
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 2.671

Review 5.  Social factors in bird-song development: Learning to sing with friends and rivals.

Authors:  Michael D Beecher; Çağlar Akçay
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  Language: the perspective from organismal biology.

Authors:  Daniel Margoliash; Howard C Nusbaum
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Robust behavioral effects of song playback in the absence of testosterone or corticosterone release.

Authors:  Kimberly A Rosvall; Dustin G Reichard; Stephen M Ferguson; Danielle J Whittaker; Ellen D Ketterson
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2012-07-28       Impact factor: 3.587

8.  Shared songs are of lower performance in the dark-eyed junco.

Authors:  Gonçalo C Cardoso; Jonathan W Atwell
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 2.963

9.  A nocturnal rail with a simple territorial call eavesdrops on interactions between rivals.

Authors:  Lucyna Ewa Wojas; Paweł Wojciech Podkowa; Tomasz Stanisław Osiejuk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Social learning exploits the available auditory or visual cues.

Authors:  Nihaad Paraouty; Joey A Charbonneau; Dan H Sanes
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.