Literature DB >> 11373236

Parotid masses: prediction of malignancy using magnetization transfer and MR imaging findings.

S Takashima1, J Wang, F Takayama, M Momose, T Matsushita, S Kawakami, A Saito, T Ishiyama.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We determined the most accurate criteria for predicting malignancy of masses in the parotid gland using magnetization transfer ratios. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Lesion-to-muscle magnetization transfer ratios obtained with a spoiled gradient-recalled acquisition in a steady state sequence with a 1-kHz off-resonance pulse were measured in 72 parotid masses (52 benign lesions, 20 malignant tumors). Various MR imaging findings and lesion-to-muscle magnetization transfer ratios were simultaneously assessed using a logistic model to determine the useful factors for predicting malignancy. We also studied the clinical usage of magnetization transfer ratios.
RESULTS: Of the MR imaging findings, poorly defined margins showed the highest accuracy, 81%, with 60% sensitivity and 88% specificity. Of the lesion-to-muscle magnetization transfer ratios, a ratio of greater than 0.71 was most accurate (85%), with 90% sensitivity and 83% specificity. All four recurrent tumors and 10 (91%) of 11 secondary tumors were correctly diagnosed using the magnetization transfer ratio analysis. The logistic model revealed that the margin characteristics (p = 0.084) and lesion-to-muscle magnetization transfer ratios (p < 0.001) were statistically significant predictors for malignancy. A combined criteria of poorly defined margins and a lesion-to-muscle magnetization transfer ratio of greater than 0.71 raised the accuracy to 86% and specificity to 96%, but the sensitivity decreased to 60%.
CONCLUSION: A combination of MR imaging findings and lesion-to-muscle magnetization transfer ratios was the most accurate predictor of malignancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11373236     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.176.6.1761577

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  7 in total

Review 1.  Functional MRI and CT biomarkers in oncology.

Authors:  J M Winfield; G S Payne; N M deSouza
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  MR imaging of parotid tumors: typical lesion characteristics in MR imaging improve discrimination between benign and malignant disease.

Authors:  A Christe; C Waldherr; R Hallett; P Zbaeren; H Thoeny
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Preoperative diagnostic values of fine-needle cytology and MRI in parotid gland tumors.

Authors:  J Paris; F Facon; T Pascal; M A Chrestian; G Moulin; M Zanaret
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Salivary gland tumors of the parotid gland: CT and MR imaging findings with emphasis on intratumoral cystic components.

Authors:  Hiroki Kato; Masayuki Kanematsu; Haruo Watanabe; Keisuke Mizuta; Mitsuhiro Aoki
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Correlation between equivalent cross-relaxation rate and cellular density in soft tissue tumors.

Authors:  Shunsuke Hamada; Shigeru Matsushima; Hideshi Sugiura; Kenji Yamada; Yoshihiro Nishida; Naoki Ishiguro
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Delayed enhancement in differential diagnosis of salivary gland neoplasm.

Authors:  Alfonso Reginelli; Alfredo Clemente; Matteo Renzulli; Nicola Maggialetti; Mario Santagata; Giuseppe Colella; Valerio Nardone; Rita Golfieri; Luca Brunese; Salvatore Cappabianca
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2019-09

7.  [Correlation between magnetic resonance imaging and extemporaneous and definitive histological examination of parotid gland tumors: a case series].

Authors:  Najib Zouhair; Sanaa Mallouk; Youssef Oukessou; Sami Rouadi; Redallah Larbi Abada; Mohamed Roubal; Mohamed Mahtar
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2020-09-22
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.