OBJECTIVE: This study examined the utility of sexual behavior problems as a diagnostic indicator of sexual abuse. The hypothesis was that sexual behavior problems are multiply determined and consequently are variably related to sexual abuse in a clinical sample. METHOD: A sample of 247 children evaluated for sexual abuse at a multidisciplinary forensic child abuse evaluation clinic were included. Results from the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) and the Child Sexual Behavior Inventory (CSBI) were analyzed and compared to the results of a structured abuse assessment performed independent of these scores. RESULTS: The forensic team assessment found evidence of sexual abuse in 25% of cases, and no evidence in 61%. Children in this sample exhibited an elevated level of both sexual and nonsexual behavior problems. However, considerable variability was noted in sexual behavior problem scores. Thus, in this study a high score or a low score had no relationship to the diagnosis of sexual abuse. Indeed, nonsexually abused children were just as likely to have high CSBI scores as sexually abused children. CONCLUSIONS: This study found no significant relationship between a diagnosis of sexual abuse and the presence or absence of sexual behavior problems in a sample of children referred for sexual abuse evaluation. The finding suggests that community professionals should use caution in relying on sexual behavior problems as a diagnostic indicator of abuse.
OBJECTIVE: This study examined the utility of sexual behavior problems as a diagnostic indicator of sexual abuse. The hypothesis was that sexual behavior problems are multiply determined and consequently are variably related to sexual abuse in a clinical sample. METHOD: A sample of 247 children evaluated for sexual abuse at a multidisciplinary forensic child abuse evaluation clinic were included. Results from the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) and the Child Sexual Behavior Inventory (CSBI) were analyzed and compared to the results of a structured abuse assessment performed independent of these scores. RESULTS: The forensic team assessment found evidence of sexual abuse in 25% of cases, and no evidence in 61%. Children in this sample exhibited an elevated level of both sexual and nonsexual behavior problems. However, considerable variability was noted in sexual behavior problem scores. Thus, in this study a high score or a low score had no relationship to the diagnosis of sexual abuse. Indeed, nonsexually abused children were just as likely to have high CSBI scores as sexually abused children. CONCLUSIONS: This study found no significant relationship between a diagnosis of sexual abuse and the presence or absence of sexual behavior problems in a sample of children referred for sexual abuse evaluation. The finding suggests that community professionals should use caution in relying on sexual behavior problems as a diagnostic indicator of abuse.
Authors: Mana H Vriesman; Thekla F Vrolijk-Bosschaart; Ramón J L Lindauer; Johanna H van der Lee; Sonja Brilleslijper-Kater; Arianne H Teeuw; Marc A Benninga Journal: BMJ Paediatr Open Date: 2022-02
Authors: Thekla F Vrolijk-Bosschaart; Sonja N Brilleslijper-Kater; Guy A Widdershoven; Arianne Rian H Teeuw; Eva Verlinden; Yolande Voskes; Esther M van Duin; Arnoud P Verhoeff; Marc A Benninga; Ramón J L Lindauer Journal: Eur J Pediatr Date: 2017-08-26 Impact factor: 3.183
Authors: Thekla F Vrolijk-Bosschaart; Sonja N Brilleslijper-Kater; Marc A Benninga; Ramón J L Lindauer; Arianne H Teeuw Journal: Eur J Pediatr Date: 2018-06-25 Impact factor: 3.183
Authors: Jill R McTavish; Andrea Gonzalez; Nancy Santesso; Jennifer C D MacGregor; Chris McKee; Harriet L MacMillan Journal: BMC Pediatr Date: 2020-03-07 Impact factor: 2.125