Literature DB >> 11369597

Clonal lines of transgenic fibroblast cells derived from the same fetus result in different development when used for nuclear transfer in pigs.

B Kühholzer1, R J Hawley, L Lai, D Kolber-Simonds, R S Prather.   

Abstract

Different factors are believed to influence the outcome of nuclear transfer (NT) experiments. Besides the cell cycle stage of both recipient cytoplast and donor karyoplast, the origin of the donor cells (embryonic, fetal, and adult) is of interest. We compared in vitro development of NT embryos derived from small serum-starved (G0) or small cycling (G1) porcine fetal fibroblast cells. Serum starvation did not have a positive effect on cleavage rate or the percentage of embryos that developed to the morula and blastocyst stages. Next, we investigated the development of porcine NT embryos derived from different transgenic clonal cell lines that had originated from the same fetus. When different clonal lines of fetal fibroblasts were fused to enucleated metaphase II oocytes, differences in fusion rates as well as in development to the morula and blastocyst stages were observed (P < 0.05). When oocytes derived from sow ovaries were used as recipient cytoplasts, significantly better cleavage (P = 0.03) and blastocyst formation (P < 0.014) was obtained when compared with oocytes derived from gilts. Our data indicate that not only different cell lines, but also different clones derived from one primary cell line, result in different development when used for NT. In addition, the use of sow oocytes as a cytoplast source also improves the efficiency of NT experiments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11369597     DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod64.6.1695

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Reprod        ISSN: 0006-3363            Impact factor:   4.285


  13 in total

1.  Morphologic and histologic comparisons between in vivo and nuclear transfer derived porcine embryos.

Authors:  L Martin; C Besch-Williford; L Lai; H-T Cheong; G-S Im; K-W Park; C Murphy; Y Hao; M R Ellersieck; D H Keisler; H Schatten; J A Green; R S Prather
Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.609

2.  Birth of piglets from in vitro-produced, zona-intact porcine embryos vitrified in a closed system.

Authors:  H Men; C Zhao; W Si; C N Murphy; L Spate; Y Liu; E M Walters; M S Samuel; R S Prather; J K Critser
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  Somatic cell nuclear transfer efficiency: how can it be improved through nuclear remodeling and reprogramming?

Authors:  Kristin M Whitworth; Randall S Prather
Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 2.609

4.  Establishment and characterization of fetal fibroblast cell lines for generating human lysozyme transgenic goats by somatic cell nuclear transfer.

Authors:  Jun Liu; Yan Luo; Liming Zheng; Qingqing Liu; Zhongcai Yang; Yongsheng Wang; Jianmin Su; Fusheng Quan; Yong Zhang
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 2.788

5.  Epigenetic reprogramming by somatic cell nuclear transfer in primates.

Authors:  Michelle Sparman; Vikas Dighe; Hathaitip Sritanaudomchai; Hong Ma; Cathy Ramsey; Darlene Pedersen; Lisa Clepper; Prashant Nighot; Don Wolf; Jon Hennebold; Shoukhrat Mitalipov
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 6.277

6.  Potential of primary kidney cells for somatic cell nuclear transfer mediated transgenesis in pig.

Authors:  Anne Richter; Mayuko Kurome; Barbara Kessler; Valeri Zakhartchenko; Nikolai Klymiuk; Hiroshi Nagashima; Eckhard Wolf; Annegret Wuensch
Journal:  BMC Biotechnol       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 2.563

7.  Anti-bacterial activity of recombinant human β-defensin-3 secreted in the milk of transgenic goats produced by somatic cell nuclear transfer.

Authors:  Jun Liu; Yan Luo; Hengtao Ge; Chengquan Han; Hui Zhang; Yongsheng Wang; Jianmin Su; Fusheng Quan; Mingqing Gao; Yong Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Factors influencing the efficiency of generating genetically engineered pigs by nuclear transfer: multi-factorial analysis of a large data set.

Authors:  Mayuko Kurome; Ludwig Geistlinger; Barbara Kessler; Valeri Zakhartchenko; Nikolai Klymiuk; Annegret Wuensch; Anne Richter; Andrea Baehr; Katrin Kraehe; Katinka Burkhardt; Krzysztof Flisikowski; Tatiana Flisikowska; Claudia Merkl; Martina Landmann; Marina Durkovic; Alexander Tschukes; Simone Kraner; Dirk Schindelhauer; Tobias Petri; Alexander Kind; Hiroshi Nagashima; Angelika Schnieke; Ralf Zimmer; Eckhard Wolf
Journal:  BMC Biotechnol       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 2.563

Review 9.  Nuclear transfer: progress and quandaries.

Authors:  Xuemei Li; Ziyi Li; Alice Jouneau; Qi Zhou; Jean-Paul Renard
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2003-11-07       Impact factor: 5.211

Review 10.  Creating genetically modified pigs by using nuclear transfer.

Authors:  Liangxue Lai; Randall S Prather
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2003-11-07       Impact factor: 5.211

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.