Literature DB >> 11368139

Ultrafast magnetic resonance imaging of central nervous system abnormalities in utero in the second and third trimester of pregnancy: comparison with ultrasound.

E Whitby1, M N Paley, N Davies, A Sprigg, P D Griffiths.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the ability of ultrafast magnetic resonance imaging to visualise abnormalities in the central nervous system of third trimester fetuses in utero and to compare the results with the current 'reference standard' of ultrasound and postnatal imaging or post-mortem data.
DESIGN: A prospective, observational study comparing the diagnostic accuracy of two imaging methods: antenatal ultrasound and antenatal magnetic resonance with each other and postnatal or post mortem data. POPULATION: Twenty-one pregnant women of 19-36 weeks of gestation whose fetus were thought to have a central nervous system abnormality on the basis of antenatal ultrasound. The women had either not been offered or had refused a termination and were willing to have a magnetic resonance scan.
METHODS: A 1.5T magnetic resonance scanner used a single shot fast spin echo sequence, in three image planes. The results were compared with the ultrasound results obtained by an experienced investigator independently. A series of 21 patients, with a range of pathologies of central nervous system, were imaged. Postnatal ultrasound and/or magnetic resonance imaging, or post-mortem data were used for additional confirmation of the pathology in all cases.
RESULTS: The magnetic resonance report was different to the ultrasound in 10/21 (47.6%), magnetic resonance provided information additional to the ultrasound in 5/21 (23.8%), ultrasound and magnetic resonance results agreed in 6/21 cases (28.6%).
CONCLUSION: Magnetic resonance in the third trimester provides a useful adjuvant to ultrasound imaging of the fetus when assessing abnormalities of the central nervous system after 19 weeks of gestation particularly if the abnormality involves the posterior fossa.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11368139     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2001.00115.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  9 in total

Review 1.  In utero magnetic resonance imaging for brain and spinal abnormalities in fetuses.

Authors:  Paul D Griffiths; Martyn N J Paley; Elysa Widjaja; Chris Taylor; Elspeth H Whitby
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-09-10

2.  High resolution post-mortem MRI of non-fixed in situ foetal brain in the second trimester of gestation: Normal foetal brain development.

Authors:  Elisa Scola; Giorgio Conte; Giovanni Palumbo; Sabrina Avignone; Claudia Maria Cinnante; Simona Boito; Nicola Persico; Tommaso Rizzuti; Fabio Triulzi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging: reproducibility of regional apparent diffusion coefficients for the normal fetal brain.

Authors:  A C Boyer; L F Gonçalves; W Lee; A Shetty; A Holman; L Yeo; R Romero
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 7.299

4.  Imaging the fetal spine using in utero MR: diagnostic accuracy and impact on management.

Authors:  Paul D Griffiths; Elysa Widjaja; Martyn N J Paley; Elspeth H Whitby
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2006-07-18

5.  Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of fetal anomalies: a blinded case-control study.

Authors:  L F Gonçalves; W Lee; S Mody; A Shetty; H Sangi-Haghpeykar; R Romero
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-07-10       Impact factor: 7.299

6.  Foetal magnetic resonance imaging: A necessity or adjunct? A modality comparison of in-utero ultrasound and ultrafast foetal magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Sunaina Ramdass; Sumaiya Adam; Zarina Lockhat; Andries Masenge; Farhana E Suleman
Journal:  SA J Radiol       Date:  2021-03-19

7.  Attention-guided deep learning for gestational age prediction using fetal brain MRI.

Authors:  Liyue Shen; Jimmy Zheng; Edward H Lee; Katie Shpanskaya; Emily S McKenna; Mahesh G Atluri; Dinko Plasto; Courtney Mitchell; Lillian M Lai; Carolina V Guimaraes; Hisham Dahmoush; Jane Chueh; Safwan S Halabi; John M Pauly; Lei Xing; Quin Lu; Ozgur Oztekin; Beth M Kline-Fath; Kristen W Yeom
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Patient safety issues in magnetic resonance imaging: state of the art.

Authors:  A Stecco; A Saponaro; A Carriero
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2007-06-11       Impact factor: 6.313

9.  A prospective study of fetuses with isolated ventriculomegaly investigated by antenatal sonography and in utero MR imaging.

Authors:  P D Griffiths; M J Reeves; J E Morris; G Mason; S A Russell; M N J Paley; E H Whitby
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 4.966

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.