Literature DB >> 11359538

The ethics of evidence-based patient choice.

M Parker1.   

Abstract

In this paper I analyse the ethical implications of the concept of 'evidence-based patient choice' in the light of criticism of the 'individualism' of patient-centred medicine. I argue that individualism in the sense used by the critics of patient centred medicine is not an inevitable consequence of an emphasis on patient choice and that a concern with the promotion of individual choices is not incompatible with 'communitarian' values. Indeed, I argue that any ethical approach to decision-making in health-care must be capable of taking seriously both the moral status of the individual (and of his or her choices) and the moral significance of the social dimensions of such choices. The best way to ensure respect for the principle of autonomy, I suggest, is to facilitate and encourage social interactions of a particular, deliberative, kind. This is also the best way to ensure that the broader public interest is taken into account in decision-making.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Health Care and Public Health; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11359538      PMCID: PMC5060060          DOI: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2001.00137.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Expect        ISSN: 1369-6513            Impact factor:   3.377


  3 in total

1.  Autonomy and paternalism in communitarian society. Patient rights in Israel.

Authors:  M L Gross
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.683

2.  Evidence-based medicine. A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992-11-04       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Practice guidelines for preventive care: the Canadian experience. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination.

Authors:  R N Battista
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 5.386

  3 in total
  7 in total

1.  Participation in screening programmes.

Authors:  V Entwistle
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 2.  The potential contribution of decision aids to screening programmes.

Authors:  V Entwistle
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Measuring Preferences for Colorectal Cancer Screening: What are the Implications for Moving Forward?

Authors:  Deborah Marshall; S Elizabeth McGregor; Gillian Currie
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 3.883

4.  Evidence-based medicine in practice: limiting or facilitating patient choice?

Authors:  Wendy A Rogers
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Evaluating the Concept of Choice in Healthcare.

Authors:  Yusrita Zolkefli
Journal:  Malays J Med Sci       Date:  2017-12-29

6.  Social patterning of screening uptake and the impact of facilitating informed choices: psychological and ethical analyses.

Authors:  Rachel Crockett; Timothy M Wilkinson; Theresa M Marteau
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2007-06-28

7.  Factors Associated With a Patient's Decision to Select a Cost-effective vs the Most Effective Therapy for Their Own Eye Disease.

Authors:  Danyal Malik; Xuan Cao; Jaron Castillo Sanchez; Tianshun Gao; Jiang Qian; Silvia Montaner; Akrit Sodhi
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-02-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.