Literature DB >> 11359536

Participation in screening programmes.

V Entwistle.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11359536      PMCID: PMC5060057          DOI: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2001.00146.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Expect        ISSN: 1369-6513            Impact factor:   3.377


× No keyword cloud information.
  8 in total

1.  Information about screening - is it to achieve high uptake or to ensure informed choice?

Authors:  A E Raffle
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  The ethics of evidence-based patient choice.

Authors:  M Parker
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 3.  Increasing informed uptake and non-uptake of screening: evidence from a systematic review.

Authors:  R G Jepson; C A Forbes; A J Sowden; R A Lewis
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 4.  Mammography messages in popular media: implications for patient expectations and shared clinical decision-making.

Authors:  K S Dobias; C A Moyer; S E McAchran; S J Katz; S S Sonnad
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Is informed choice in genetic testing a different breed of informed decision-making? A discussion paper.

Authors:  J Emery
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  A measure of informed choice.

Authors:  T M Marteau; E Dormandy; S Michie
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 7.  The potential contribution of decision aids to screening programmes.

Authors:  V Entwistle
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  How risks of breast cancer and benefits of screening are communicated to women: analysis of 58 pamphlets.

Authors:  E K Slaytor; J E Ward
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-07-25
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.