Literature DB >> 11359486

Maxillary bone grafting for insertion of endosseous implants: results after 12-124 months.

G M Raghoebar1, N M Timmenga, H Reintsema, B Stegenga, A Vissink.   

Abstract

Insertion of endosseous implants in the atrophic maxilla is often complicated because of lack of supporting bone. Augmentation of the floor of the maxillary sinus with autogenous bone graft has been proven to be a reliable treatment modality, at least in the short term. The long-term clinical and radiographic outcome with regard to the grafts, the implants and satisfaction of the patients with their implant-supported overdenture was studied in 99 patients. The sinus floor was augmented with bone grafts derived from the iliac crest (83 subjects, 162 sinuses, 353 implants), the mandibular symphysis (14, 18, 37), or the maxillary tuberosity (2, 2, 2). Before implant installation, the width and height of the alveolar crest were increased in a first stage procedure in 74 patients, while in the other 25 patients augmentation and implant installation could be performed simultaneously (width and height of the alveolar crest >5 mm). Perforation of the sinus membrane occurred in 47 cases, which did not predispose to the development of sinusitis. Loss of bone particles and sequestration were observed in one (diabetic) patient only, in whom a dehiscence of the oral mucosa occurred. A second augmentation procedure was successful in this patient. Symptoms of transient sinusitis were observed in 3 patients. These symptoms were successfully treated with decongestants and antibiotics. 2 other patients developed a purulent sinusitis which resolved after a nasal antrostomy. In all cases, the bone volume was sufficient for implant insertion. 32 of 392 inserted Brånemark implants (8.2%) were lost during the follow-up. After the healing period of the bone grafts, no sinus pathology was observed. The patients received implant-supported overdentures (72 patients) or fixed bridges (27 patients). Overall, the patients were very satisfied with the prosthetic construction. We conclude that bone grafting of the floor of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous bone for the insertion of implants is a reliable treatment modality with good long-term results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11359486     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012003279.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  18 in total

Review 1.  ENT assessment in the integrated management of candidate for (maxillary) sinus lift.

Authors:  L Pignataro; M Mantovani; S Torretta; G Felisati; G Sambataro
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.124

2.  Incomplete bone formation after sinus augmentation: A case report on radiological findings by computerized tomography at follow-up.

Authors:  Kyung-Shil Lee; Young-Hyuk Kwon; Yeek Herr; Seung-Il Shin; Ji-Yeon Lee; Jong-Hyuk Chung
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 2.614

3.  Bone-added osteotome sinus floor elevation with simultaneous placement of non-submerged sand blasted with large grit and acid etched implants: a 5-year radiographic evaluation.

Authors:  Jee-Hee Jung; Seong-Ho Choi; Kyoo-Sung Cho; Chang-Sung Kim
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 2.614

4.  Increased infection rates of sinus floor elevations after the use of a bone filter.

Authors:  Nicolai M Purcz; Falk Birkenfeld; Marc Oetke; Marcus Will; Larissa Purcz; Volker Gaßling; Yahya Acil; Joerg Wiltfang
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-10-12       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 5.  [Sinus floor elevation and augmentation. Evidence-based analysis of prognosis and risk factors].

Authors:  F P Strietzel
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2004-02-06

6.  Comparison of autogenous tooth bone graft and synthetic bone graft materials used for bone resorption around implants after crestal approach sinus lifting: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Young-Kyun Kim; Junho Lee; Ji-Young Yun; Pil-Young Yun; In-Woong Um
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 2.614

7.  Prevalence of bony septa, antral pathology, and dimensions of the maxillary sinus from a sinus augmentation perspective: A retrospective cone-beam computed tomography study.

Authors:  Aditya Tadinada; Elnaz Jalali; Wesam Al-Salman; Shantanu Jambhekar; Bina Katechia; Khalid Almas
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2016-06-23

8.  Schneider membrane elevation in presence of sinus septa: anatomic features and surgical management.

Authors:  Mario Beretta; Marco Cicciù; Ennio Bramanti; Carlo Maiorana
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2012-07-17

9.  Esthetic outcome of implant-based reconstructions in augmented bone: comparison of autologous and allogeneic bone block grafting with the pink esthetic score (PES).

Authors:  Markus Schlee; Jan-Friedrich Dehner; Katja Baukloh; Arndt Happe; Oliver Seitz; Robert Sader
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 2.151

10.  Perforated schneiderian membrane repair during sinus augmentation in conjunction with immediate implant placement.

Authors:  K Hameed Fathima; V S Harish; Perumal Jayavely; P Harinath
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2014-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.