OBJECTIVES: The collection of bone debris during the preparation of sinus floor augmentations is a commonly used technique for avoiding autologous bone transplants and thereby reducing donor site morbidity. However, the collected bone debris has a higher risk of bacterial contamination. The aim of this retrospective study was to analyse whether the use of a bone filter had an impact on the infection rates after sinus floor augmentation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted of 340 sinus floor elevations (136 using a bone filter) in 249 patients. The sinus floor elevations were performed with the lateral approach. RESULTS: Localised infection occurred in 7.0 % (24 of 340) of the sinus floor elevations. In 40.0 % of the cases, a bone filter was used, and in this group, the infection rate was 13.0 %. In the control group, the infection rate was 4.0 %. One hundred one patients received bone transplants from the iliac crest, and these patients had a lower infection rate of 2.0 %. Stepwise factor reduction, according to Akaike, showed the use of a bone filter to be the most relevant factor for postoperative infection. CONCLUSIONS: To reduce the amount of bacteria, full-mouth disinfection with chemical agents and a strict aspiration protocol should be used when a bone filter is applied. Antibiotic prophylaxis should be prescribed to reduce the risk of postoperative infections further. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In use of a bone filter, there is the possibility of higher infection rates of sinus floor augmentations.
OBJECTIVES: The collection of bone debris during the preparation of sinus floor augmentations is a commonly used technique for avoiding autologous bone transplants and thereby reducing donor site morbidity. However, the collected bone debris has a higher risk of bacterial contamination. The aim of this retrospective study was to analyse whether the use of a bone filter had an impact on the infection rates after sinus floor augmentation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted of 340 sinus floor elevations (136 using a bone filter) in 249 patients. The sinus floor elevations were performed with the lateral approach. RESULTS: Localised infection occurred in 7.0 % (24 of 340) of the sinus floor elevations. In 40.0 % of the cases, a bone filter was used, and in this group, the infection rate was 13.0 %. In the control group, the infection rate was 4.0 %. One hundred one patients received bone transplants from the iliac crest, and these patients had a lower infection rate of 2.0 %. Stepwise factor reduction, according to Akaike, showed the use of a bone filter to be the most relevant factor for postoperative infection. CONCLUSIONS: To reduce the amount of bacteria, full-mouth disinfection with chemical agents and a strict aspiration protocol should be used when a bone filter is applied. Antibiotic prophylaxis should be prescribed to reduce the risk of postoperative infections further. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In use of a bone filter, there is the possibility of higher infection rates of sinus floor augmentations.
Authors: J Wiltfang; S Schultze-Mosgau; E Nkenke; M Thorwarth; F W Neukam; K A Schlegel Journal: Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg Date: 2005-06-22 Impact factor: 2.789
Authors: Marco Esposito; Maria Gabriella Grusovin; Jonathan Rees; Dimitrios Karasoulos; Pietro Felice; Rami Alissa; Helen V Worthington; Paul Coulthard Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2010-03-17