Literature DB >> 11358175

Mechanism of oxidation of inorganic sulfur compounds by thiosulfate-grown Thiobacillus thiooxidans.

R J Masau1, J K Oh, I Suzuki.   

Abstract

Thiobacillus thiooxidans was grown at pH 5 on thiosulfate as an energy source, and the mechanism of oxidation of inorganic sulfur compounds was studied by the effect of inhibitors, stoichiometries of oxygen consumption and sulfur, sulfite, or tetrathionate accumulation, and cytochrome reduction by substrates. Both intact cells and cell-free extracts were used in the study. The results are consistent with the pathway with sulfur and sulfite as the key intermediates. Thiosulfate was oxidized after cleavage to sulfur and sulfite as intermediates at pH 5, the optimal growth pH on thiosulfate, but after initial condensation to tetrathionate at pH 2.3 where the organism failed to grow. N-Ethylmaleimide (NEM) inhibited sulfur oxidation directly and the oxidation of thiosulfate or tetrathionate indirectly. It did not inhibit the sulfite oxidation by cells, but inhibited any reduction of cell cytochromes by sulfur, thiosulfate, tetrathionate, and sulfite. NEM probably binds sulfhydryl groups, which are possibly essential in supplying electrons to initiate sulfur oxidation. 2-Heptyl-4-hydroxy-quinoline N-oxide (HQNO) inhibited the oxidation of sulfite directly and that of sulfur, thiosulfate, and tetrathionate indirectly. Uncouplers, carbonyl cyanide-m-chlorophenylhydrazone (CCCP) and 2,4-dinitrophenol (DNP), inhibited sulfite oxidation by cells, but not the oxidation by extracts, while HQNO inhibited both. It is proposed that HQNO inhibits the oxidation of sulfite at the cytochrome b site both in cells and extracts, but uncouplers inhibit the oxidation in cells only by collapsing the energized state of cells, delta muH+, required either for electron transfer from cytochrome c to b or for sulfite binding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11358175

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Microbiol        ISSN: 0008-4166            Impact factor:   2.419


  9 in total

1.  Variability in Halothiobacillus neapolitanus type strain cultures.

Authors:  Suneel Chhatre; Joaquin Deleon; Benjamin Goldbaum; John Latham; Srikanth Panchalingala; Newton P Hilliard
Journal:  Indian J Microbiol       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 2.461

2.  Distribution, diversity, and activities of sulfur dioxygenases in heterotrophic bacteria.

Authors:  Honglei Liu; Yufeng Xin; Luying Xun
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Effects of inhibitors and NaCl on the oxidation of reduced inorganic sulfur compounds by a marine acidophilic, sulfur-oxidizing bacterium, Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans strain SH.

Authors:  Kazuo Kamimura; Emi Higashino; Tadayoshi Kanao; Tsuyoshi Sugio
Journal:  Extremophiles       Date:  2004-09-16       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  Periplasmic cytochrome c3 of Desulfovibrio vulgaris is directly involved in H2-mediated metal but not sulfate reduction.

Authors:  Dwayne A Elias; Joseph M Suflita; Michael J McInerney; Lee R Krumholz
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Engineering and analysis of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain that uses formaldehyde as an auxiliary substrate.

Authors:  Richard J S Baerends; Erik de Hulster; Jan-Maarten A Geertman; Jean-Marc Daran; Antonius J A van Maris; Marten Veenhuis; Ida J van der Klei; Jack T Pronk
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-03-31       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Operational parameters in H2S biofiltration under extreme acid conditions: performance, biomass control, and CO2 consumption.

Authors:  Teresa García-Pérez; Sergio Hernández-Jiménez; Sergio Revah
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Assessment of the stoichiometry and efficiency of CO2 fixation coupled to reduced sulfur oxidation.

Authors:  Judith M Klatt; Lubos Polerecky
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  C(1) compounds as auxiliary substrate for engineered Pseudomonas putida S12.

Authors:  Frank W Koopman; Johannes H de Winde; Harald J Ruijssenaars
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Metabolic reconstruction of sulfur assimilation in the extremophile Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans based on genome analysis.

Authors:  Jorge Valdés; Felipe Veloso; Eugenia Jedlicki; David Holmes
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 3.969

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.