Literature DB >> 11357697

[Semitendinosus tendon vs. patellar ligament. Results of a prospective randomized study after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction].

M Röpke1, R Becker, D Urbach, W Nebelung.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The aim of our prospective randomised study was to evaluate the clinical results after arthroscopical reconstruction of the ACL using the midthird patellar ligament or semitendinosus tendon.
METHODS: Forty patients were followed up two years postoperatively. Twenty of them received either a patellar ligament graft (BTB-group) or doubled semiteninosus tendon (SET-group). The clinical evaluation included the preoperative and two years postoperative assessment, based on the IKDC-Score, Tegener-Score and Mc-Carroll-Score. The a.p.-translation was evaluated using the KT-1000.
RESULTS: Sixteen (80%) patients of the SET-group and 10 (50%) patients of the BTB-group showed good and excellent results in the over all assessment with the IKDC-Score. The mean side to side KT-1000 difference yielded 1.6 mm (-2-4 mm) in the BTB-group and 2.7 mm (0-7 mm) in the SET-group (p < 0.05). The retropatellar pain syndrome based on the Mc-Caroll-Score showed 17.4 points in the BTB-group in comparison to 19.5 points in the SET-group (p < 0.05). The level of activity using the Tegner-score showed preoperatively for both the SET- and BTB-group 6.9 points and postoperatively for the SET-group 6.7 points and for the BTB-group 5.6 points.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the inferior a.p.-stability for the patients who received doubled semitendinosus tendon grafts they presented clinically superior results compared to the BTB-group. Therefore this technique seems to be the alternative method. In order to improve the stability we recommend the usage of three or four stranded grafts and an improved fixation technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11357697     DOI: 10.1007/s001130050733

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Unfallchirurg        ISSN: 0177-5537            Impact factor:   1.000


  8 in total

1.  [Histological findings for human tibial bone-tendon healing after hamstring transplantation. Investigation of tibial insertion after reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligaments with hamstring transplantation near joint fixation using bioresorbable interference screws].

Authors:  C-E Heyde; V Wiechmann; M Pyschik; A Gosse
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 2.  Credibility and quality of meta-analyses addressing graft choice in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review.

Authors:  Adrian Kurz; Nathan Evaniew; Marco Yeung; Kristian Samuelsson; Devin Peterson; Olufemi R Ayeni
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-08-20       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Differences in the rehabilitation period following two methods of anterior cruciate ligament replacement: semitendinosus/gracilis tendon vs. ligamentum patellae.

Authors:  Tim Rose; Thomas Engel; Joachim Bernhard; Pierre Hepp; Christoph Josten; Helmut Lill
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2003-09-26       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Functional outcomes and health-related quality of life after robot-assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon grafts.

Authors:  Dirk Stengel; Frank Klufmöller; Grit Rademacher; Sven Mutze; Kai Bauwens; Kay Butenschön; Julia Seifert; Michael Wich; Axel Ekkernkamp
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-01-09       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Resorbable screws versus pins for optimal transplant fixation (SPOT) in anterior cruciate ligament replacement with autologous hamstring grafts: rationale and design of a randomized, controlled, patient and investigator blinded trial [ISRCTN17384369].

Authors:  Dirk Stengel; Gerrit Matthes; Julia Seifert; Volker Tober; Sven Mutze; Grit Rademacher; Axel Ekkernkamp; Kai Bauwens; Michael Wich; Dirk Casper
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2005-02-21       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 6.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: principles of treatment.

Authors:  Nikolaos K Paschos; Stephen M Howell
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2017-03-13

7.  Return to Baseline Physical Activity After Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Versus Hamstring Tendon Autografts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Jeremy J Bergeron; Quentin P Sercia; Justin Drager; Stéphane Pelet; Etienne L Belzile
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 7.010

Review 8.  Results After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Patients Older Than 40 Years: How Do They Compare With Younger Patients? A Systematic Review and Comparison With Younger Populations.

Authors:  Nathan A Mall; Rachel M Frank; Bryan M Saltzman; Brian J Cole; Bernard R Bach
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.843

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.