Literature DB >> 11357499

FDG-PET imaging for the staging and follow-up of small cell lung cancer.

T Schumacher1, I Brink, M Mix, M Reinhardt, G Herget, W Digel, M Henke, E Moser, E Nitzsche.   

Abstract

The staging procedures for small cell lung cancer do not differ appreciably from those for other forms of lung cancer. For practical purposes, the TNM stages are usually collapsed into a simple binary classification: limited disease and extensive disease. This study was performed to answer the question of whether fluorine-18 labelled 2-deoxy-2-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) imaging permits appropriate work-up (including both primary and follow-up staging) of patients presenting with small cell lung cancer, as compared with currently recommended staging procedures. Thirty-six FDG-PET examinations were performed in 30 patients with histologically proven small cell lung cancer. Twenty-four patients were examined for primary staging while four were imaged for therapy follow-up only. Two patients underwent both primary staging and up to four examinations for therapy follow-up. Static PET imaging was performed according to a standard protocol. Image reconstruction was based on an ordered subset expectation maximization algorithm including post-injection segmented attenuation correction. Results of FDG-PET were compared with those of the sum of other staging procedures. Identical results from FDG-PET and the sum of the other staging procedures were obtained in 23 of 36 examinations (6x limited disease, 12x extensive disease, 5x no evidence of disease). In contrast to the results of conventional staging, FDG-PET indicated extensive disease resulting in an up-staging in seven patients. In one patient in whom there was no evidence for tumour on conventional investigations following treatment, FDG-PET was suggestive of residual viability of the primary tumour. Furthermore, discordant results were observed in five patients with respect to lung, bone, liver and adrenal gland findings, although in these cases the results did not affect staging as limited or extensive disease. Moreover, FDG-PET appeared to be more sensitive for the detection of metastatic mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes and bone metastases. Finally, all findings considered suspicious for tumour involvement on the other staging procedures were also detected by FDG-PET. It is concluded that FDG-PET has potential for use as a simplified staging tool for small cell lung cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11357499     DOI: 10.1007/s002590100474

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0340-6997


  14 in total

1.  FDG PET and PET/CT for the detection of the primary tumour in patients with cervical non-squamous cell carcinoma metastasis of an unknown primary.

Authors:  Stefan A M Paul; Sandro J Stoeckli; Gustav K von Schulthess; Gerhard W Goerres
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006-10-03       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Prognostic significance of 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose - positron emission tomography after treatment in patients with limited stage small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Adedayo A Onitilo; Jessica M Engel; Jennifer M Demos; Bickol Mukesh
Journal:  Clin Med Res       Date:  2008-09-18

Review 3.  Epidemiology and management of common pulmonary diseases in older persons.

Authors:  Kathleen M Akgün; Kristina Crothers; Margaret Pisani
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 6.053

4.  Impact of [18F]FDG-PET on the primary staging of small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  I Brink; T Schumacher; M Mix; S Ruhland; E Stoelben; W Digel; M Henke; N Ghanem; E Moser; E U Nitzsche
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-07-17       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Positron emission tomography with [(18)F]FDOPA and [(18)F]FDG in the imaging of small cell lung carcinoma: preliminary results.

Authors:  Thierry Jacob; Dany Grahek; Nassima Younsi; Khaldoun Kerrou; Nicolas Aide; Françoise Montravers; Sonia Balogova; Cecile Colombet; Virginie De Beco; Jean N Talbot
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-07-10       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  High impact of 18F-FDG-PET on management and prognostic stratification of newly diagnosed small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Arun Azad; Fiona Chionh; Andrew M Scott; Szeting T Lee; Sam U Berlangieri; Shane White; Paul L Mitchell
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 3.488

7.  Early assessment of therapeutic response using FDG PET in small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Y Yamamoto; R Kameyama; M Murota; S Bandoh; T Ishii; Y Nishiyama
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 8.  Management of small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Kristen Keon Ciombor; Caio Max S Rocha Lima
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2006-01

Review 9.  Staging and imaging of small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Gregory P Kalemkerian
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 3.909

10.  Activity of the monocarboxylate transporter 1 inhibitor AZD3965 in small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Caroline Dive; Christopher J Morrow; Radosław Polański; Cassandra L Hodgkinson; Alberto Fusi; Daisuke Nonaka; Lynsey Priest; Paul Kelly; Francesca Trapani; Paul W Bishop; Anne White; Susan E Critchlow; Paul D Smith; Fiona Blackhall
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 12.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.