Literature DB >> 11357032

Primary vs. secondary anastomosis after sigmoid colon resection for perforated diverticulitis (Hinchey Stage III and IV): a prospective outcome and cost analysis.

M K Schilling1, C A Maurer, O Kollmar, M W Büchler.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Our hypothesis was that in patients with perforated sigmoid colon diverticulitis and peritonitis (Hinchey Stage III and IV) a one-stage sigmoid colon resection is safe and cost effective when performed by an experienced colorectal surgeon. We evaluated outcome and cost of one-stage vs. two-stage sigmoid colon resection after diverticulitis perforation and peritonitis.
METHODS: Patients undergoing emergency resection for perforated sigmoid colon diverticulitis and peritonitis (Hinchey Stage III and IV). Outcome, costs, and insurers reimbursement were compared between 13 patients undergoing sigmoid colon resection and primary anastomosis (Group A) and 42 patients undergoing sigmoid colon resection with Hartmann's procedure and secondary descendorectostomy (Group B).
RESULTS: Group A patients were comparable to Group B patients in age, gender, preoperative risk and severity of peritonitis (Mannheim Peritonitis Index and C-reactive protein). Operating room time for sigmoid colon resection with primary anastomosis (3.3 +/- 1.2 hours) was identical to the time for sigmoid colon resection with colostomy (3.3 +/- 1 hour), and morbidity and mortality, intensive care unit, and in-hospital stay were not significantly different between the two groups. In Group B patients' intestinal continuity was restored 169 +/- 74 days after the primary resection in 32 of 42 patients only (78 percent). The second procedure took on average 1.4 hours longer than the first procedure. Patients in Group B received more antibiotics (2.2 vs. 2) albeit for a shorter period of time (4.5 vs. 5.7 days, P = not significant). Overall expenses for restoration of intestinal continuity were between 74 and 229 percent higher for Group B patients than for Group A patients. Reimbursement was 18,191 +/- 16,761 SFr (Group A) and 41,321 +/- 26,983 SFr (Group B) respectively.
CONCLUSION: With meticulous surgical technique and extensive intraoperative lavage, perforated sigmoid colon diverticulitis with peritonitis can be treated by a one-stage sigmoid colon resection and anastomosis with a low mortality and morbidity. A one-stage procedure is considerably cheaper and patients are rehabilitated faster and to a higher percentage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11357032     DOI: 10.1007/bf02234569

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  44 in total

1.  Perforated left-sided diverticulitis with faecal peritonitis: is the Hinchey classification the best guide for surgical decision making?

Authors:  V Naraynsingh; R Maharaj; D Hassranah; S Hariharan; D Dan; A P Zbar
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 2.  [Surgical concepts for treatment of severe sepsis].

Authors:  O Kollmar; M K Schilling
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  Challenging a classic myth: pneumoperitoneum associated with acute diverticulitis is not an indication for open or laparoscopic emergency surgery in hemodynamically stable patients. A 10-year experience with a nonoperative treatment.

Authors:  Renato Costi; François Cauchy; Alban Le Bian; Jean-François Honart; Nicolas Creuze; Claude Smadja
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Management of peritonitis in the critically ill patient.

Authors:  Carlos A Ordoñez; Juan Carlos Puyana
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.741

Review 5.  Resection and primary anastomosis in acute complicated diverticulitis, a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Saleh Abbas
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-01-07       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Primary anastomosis with a defunctioning stoma versus Hartmann's procedure for perforated diverticulitis--a comparison of stoma reversal rates.

Authors:  P H Alizai; M Schulze-Hagen; C D Klink; F Ulmer; A A Roeth; U P Neumann; M Jansen; R Rosch
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-08-03       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Emergency left colon resection for acute perforation: primary anastomosis or Hartmann's procedure? A case-matched control study.

Authors:  Stefan Breitenstein; Armin Kraus; Dieter Hahnloser; Marco Decurtins; Pierre-Alain Clavien; Nicolas Demartines
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-08-24       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 8.  Minimally invasive surgery for diverticulitis.

Authors:  R S Turley; C R Mantyh; J Migaly
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 3.781

9.  Emergency management of diverticulitis.

Authors:  Nancy N Baxter
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2004-08

10.  Damage control surgery with abdominal vacuum and delayed bowel reconstruction in patients with perforated diverticulitis Hinchey III/IV.

Authors:  Reinhold Kafka-Ritsch; Franz Birkfellner; Alexander Perathoner; Helmut Raab; Hermann Nehoda; Johann Pratschke; Matthias Zitt
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-07-28       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.