Literature DB >> 11353880

Multicenter randomized evaluation of a nutritional education software in obese patients.

M C Turnin1, O Bourgeois, G Cathelineau, A M Leguerrier, S Halimi, D Sandre-Banon, V Coliche, M Breux, E Verlet, F Labrousse, D Bensoussan, J L Grenier, M F Poncet, F Tordjmann, J M Brun, J F Blickle, C Mattei, C Bolzonella, J C Buisson, D Fabre, J P Tauber, H Hanaire-Broutin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the efficacy of the nutritional education software, Nutri-Expert, in the management of obese adult patients.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two groups of obese patients were followed up over one year in a randomized study: the first group received close traditional management (seven nutritional visits over the year, with physicians and dietitians conjointly) and the second one also used at home by Minitel the Nutri-Expert system. 557 patients were enrolled in the study by 16 French centers of diabetology and nutrition. Body mass index (BMI), tests of dietetic knowledge, dietary records and centralized biological measurements were assessed at inclusion, 6 and 12 months. 341 patients were evaluable at the end of the year.
RESULTS: The group using Nutri-Expert scored significantly better in the tests of dietetic knowledge than the control group. For all patients, nutritional education led to a significant improvement in BMI, dietary records and biological measurements, without significant difference between the two groups. Five years after the end of the study, the weight of 148 patients was recorded; mean BMI was significantly lower than the initial value but there was no significant difference between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: In the management of obese patients, Nutri-Expert system has a role to play in reinforcing nutritional knowledge; if regular follow-up is not possible, or if a large series of obese patients is to be treated, Nutri-Expert could partly replace traditional management, for example between visits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11353880

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Metab        ISSN: 1262-3636            Impact factor:   6.041


  11 in total

1.  Belief beyond the evidence: using the proposed effect of breakfast on obesity to show 2 practices that distort scientific evidence.

Authors:  Andrew W Brown; Michelle M Bohan Brown; David B Allison
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 2.  The effect of computers for weight loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Authors:  Virginia A Reed; Karen E Schifferdecker; Michael E Rezaee; Sharon O'Connor; Robin J Larson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-07-30       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  Interactive computer-based interventions for weight loss or weight maintenance in overweight or obese people.

Authors:  L Susan Wieland; Louise Falzon; Chris N Sciamanna; Kimberlee J Trudeau; Suzanne Brodney; Joseph E Schwartz; Karina W Davidson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-08-15

4.  Evaluation of a hand-held, computer-based intervention to promote early self-care behaviors after lung transplant.

Authors:  Annette DeVito Dabbs; Mary Amanda Dew; Brad Myers; Alex Begey; Robert Hawkins; Dianxu Ren; Jacqueline Dunbar-Jacob; Erin Oconnell; Kenneth R McCurry
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 2.863

5.  An economic evaluation of adaptive e-learning devices to promote weight loss via dietary change for people with obesity.

Authors:  Alec Miners; Jody Harris; Lambert Felix; Elizabeth Murray; Susan Michie; Phil Edwards
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-07-07       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Educ@dom: comparative study of the telemonitoring of patients with type 2 diabetes versus standard monitoring-study protocol for a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Marie-Christine Turnin; Solène Schirr-Bonnans; Jacques Martini; Jean-Christophe Buisson; Soumia Taoui; Marie-Christine Chauchard; Nadège Costa; Benoît Lepage; Laurent Molinier; Hélène Hanaire
Journal:  Diabetol Metab Syndr       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 3.320

7.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of remotely delivered interventions using self-monitoring or tailored feedback to change dietary behavior.

Authors:  Natalie Teasdale; Ahmed Elhussein; Frances Butcher; Carmen Piernas; Gill Cowburn; Jamie Hartmann-Boyce; Rhea Saksena; Peter Scarborough
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 7.045

8.  Impact of a Remote Monitoring Programme Including Lifestyle Education Software in Type 2 Diabetes: Results of the Educ@dom Randomised Multicentre Study.

Authors:  Marie-Christine Turnin; Pierre Gourdy; Jacques Martini; Jean-Christophe Buisson; Marie-Christine Chauchard; Jacqueline Delaunay; Solène Schirr-Bonnans; Soumia Taoui; Marie-France Poncet; Valeria Cosma; Sandrine Lablanche; Magali Coustols-Valat; Lucie Chaillous; Charles Thivolet; Caroline Sanz; Alfred Penfornis; Benoît Lepage; Hélène Colineaux; Michaël Mounié; Nadège Costa; Laurent Molinier; Hélène Hanaire
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 2.945

Review 9.  Self-directed interventions to promote weight loss: a systematic review of reviews.

Authors:  Jason Tang; Charles Abraham; Colin Greaves; Tom Yates
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  A Fully Automated Web-Based Program Improves Lifestyle Habits and HbA1c in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Abdominal Obesity: Randomized Trial of Patient E-Coaching Nutritional Support (The ANODE Study).

Authors:  Boris Hansel; Philippe Giral; Laetitia Gambotti; Alexandre Lafourcade; Gilbert Peres; Claude Filipecki; Diana Kadouch; Agnes Hartemann; Jean-Michel Oppert; Eric Bruckert; Michel Marre; Arnaud Bruneel; Emilie Duchene; Ronan Roussel
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 5.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.