Literature DB >> 11353040

Acute adaptation of the vestibuloocular reflex: signal processing by floccular and ventral parafloccular Purkinje cells.

Y Hirata1, S M Highstein.   

Abstract

The gain of the vertical vestibuloocular reflex (VVOR), defined as eye velocity/head velocity was adapted in squirrel monkeys by employing visual-vestibular mismatch stimuli. VVOR gain, measured in the dark, could be trained to values between 0.4 and 1.5. Single-unit activity of vertical zone Purkinje cells was recorded from the flocculus and ventral paraflocculus in alert squirrel monkeys before and during the gain change training. Our goal was to evaluate the site(s) of learning of the gain change. To aid in the evaluation, a model of the vertical optokinetic reflex (VOKR) and VVOR was constructed consisting of floccular and nonfloccular systems divided into subsystems based on the known anatomy and input and output parameters. Three kinds of input to floccular Purkinje cells via mossy fibers were explicitly described, namely vestibular, visual (retinal slip), and efference copy of eye movement. The characteristics of each subsystem (gain and phase) were identified at different VOR gains by reconstructing single-unit activity of Purkinje cells during VOKR and VVOR with multiple linear regression models consisting of sensory input and motor output signals. Model adequacy was checked by evaluating the residual following the regressions and by predicting Purkinje cells' activity during visual-vestibular mismatch paradigms. As a result, parallel changes in identified characteristics with VVOR adaptation were found in the prefloccular/floccular subsystem that conveys vestibular signals and in the nonfloccular subsystem that conveys vestibular signals, while no change was found in other subsystems, namely prefloccular/floccular subsystems conveying efference copy or visual signals, nonfloccular subsystem conveying visual signals, and postfloccular subsystem transforming Purkinje cell activity to eye movements. The result suggests multiple sites for VVOR motor learning including both flocculus and nonflocculus pathways. The gain change in the nonfloccular vestibular subsystem was in the correct direction to cause VOR gain adaptation while the change in the prefloccular/floccular vestibular subsystem was incorrect (anti-compensatory). This apparent incorrect directional change might serve to prevent instability of the VOR caused by positive feedback via the efference copy pathway.

Keywords:  Non-programmatic

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11353040     DOI: 10.1152/jn.2001.85.5.2267

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  42 in total

1.  Modeling spatial tuning of adaptation of the angular vestibulo-ocular reflex.

Authors:  Yongqing Xiang; Sergei B Yakushin; Theodore Raphan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Hopes for cerebellar research in the 21st century.

Authors:  Masao Ito
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.847

3.  Cerebellar signatures of vestibulo-ocular reflex motor learning.

Authors:  Pablo M Blazquez; Yutaka Hirata; Shane A Heiney; Andrea M Green; Stephen M Highstein
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-10-29       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Recurrent cerebellar architecture solves the motor-error problem.

Authors:  John Porrill; Paul Dean; James V Stone
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  Direct causality between single-Purkinje cell activities and motor learning revealed by a cerebellum-machine interface utilizing VOR adaptation paradigm.

Authors:  Yutaka Hirata; Kazuma Katagiri; Yoshiyuki Tanaka
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.847

6.  Learning on multiple timescales in smooth pursuit eye movements.

Authors:  Yan Yang; Stephen G Lisberger
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Evidence for wide range of time scales in oculomotor plant dynamics: implications for models of eye-movement control.

Authors:  Sokratis Sklavos; John Porrill; Chris R S Kaneko; Paul Dean
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Cerebellar Purkinje cells control eye movements with a rapid rate code that is invariant to spike irregularity.

Authors:  Hannah L Payne; Ranran L French; Christine C Guo; Td Barbara Nguyen-Vu; Tiina Manninen; Jennifer L Raymond
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Searching for an Internal Representation of Stimulus Kinematics in the Response of Ventral Paraflocculus Purkinje Cells.

Authors:  Pablo M Blazquez; GyuTae Kim; Tatyana A Yakusheva
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 10.  Saccade and vestibular ocular motor adaptation.

Authors:  Michael C Schubert; David S Zee
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.406

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.