Literature DB >> 11348410

Ductal carcinoma in situ and atypical ductal hyperplasia of the breast diagnosed at stereotactic core biopsy.

I Méndez1, F J Andreu, E Sáez, M Sentís, I Jurado, M A Cabezuelo, E Castañer, X Gallardo, M J Díaz-Ruiz, E López, V Marco.   

Abstract

Stereotactic core needle biopsy (SCNB) allows specific histopathologic diagnoses to be made without surgery and has been demonstrated to be an accurate, cost-effective method of diagnosing breast disease, particularly nonpalpable lesions. However, recent studies have concluded that the diagnosis of atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) by means of SCNB has resulted in nearly equal odds that a coexisting malignant lesion will be missed. Furthermore, others have concluded that SCNB diagnosed as DCIS cannot reliably indicate the absence of tumor invasion in surgical excision. Between 1993 and 1998, 1,221 consecutive SCNB of mammographically identified lesions were performed using a 14-gauge automated device with an average of 5.3 cores obtained per lesion. ADH was identified in 19 (1.6%) lesions and DCIS in 89 (7.3%). Surgical biopsy was performed in 89 of these patients and histopathologic results from SCNB and surgical biopsies were reviewed and correlated. In 12 cases of ADH diagnosed by SCNB, surgical biopsy showed ADH in 8 (67%) cases and DCIS in the other 4 (33%) cases. In 77 cases of DCIS diagnosed by SCNB, a surgical biopsy showed DCIS in 55 (71%) cases, 6 more cases (8%) had DCIS with focal microinvasion, and 15 (19%) had invasive ductal carcinoma. In one case no residual tumor was found at surgery. In the author's patient population, the diagnosis of ADH at SCNB indicates high probability of DCIS or residual ADH in the surgical biopsy. The diagnosis of DCIS at SCNB is confirmed in the majority of surgical biopsies; however, a significant number of cases may show microinvasion or invasive carcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11348410     DOI: 10.1046/j.1524-4741.2001.007001014.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast J        ISSN: 1075-122X            Impact factor:   2.431


  4 in total

Review 1.  An overview of assessment of prognostic and predictive factors in breast cancer needle core biopsy specimens.

Authors:  E A Rakha; I O Ellis
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2007-07-14       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Factors associated with upstaging of ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed by core needle biopsy using imaging guidance.

Authors:  Cholatip Wiratkapun; Pachara Patanajareet; Bussanee Wibulpholprasert; Panuwat Lertsithichai
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2011-09-17       Impact factor: 2.374

3.  The sentinel node in breast cancer: an update.

Authors:  Conor D Collins
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2005-11-23       Impact factor: 3.909

Review 4.  The sentinel node in breast cancer.

Authors:  Conor D Collins
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2008-10-04       Impact factor: 3.909

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.