Literature DB >> 11344425

Colonoscopy in octogenarians and older patients.

J A Lagares-Garcia1, S Kurek, B Collier, F Diaz, R Schilli, J Richey, R A Moore.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Colonoscopy in the elderly has been considered by many to be risky because of mechanical bowel preparation and dehydration, electrolyte disturbances, conscious sedation, and hypoxic complications. We hypothesized that colonoscopy in octogenarians and older patients is a safe procedure.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of 803 patients who underwent colonoscopy from January 1997 to October 1997 was performed. The patients were grouped by age: group A (17-49 years) had 166 patients (20%); group B (50-79 years) had 534 patients (67%); and group C (80 years and older) had 103 patients (13%). Results were considered significant at p value less than 0.05 unless otherwise noted.
RESULTS: Blood in the stool (84%) and history of colonic vascular disease (5.8%) were the most common indication in group C (84%). Colonoscopy was used in group A (18%) more often than in the other groups to rule out inflammatory bowel disease. History of colon polyps was a more common indication in group B (20%) than in the other groups. Group A had a significantly higher incidence of normal examinations (84%) and diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease (14%). Group B had a higher incidence of polyps than the other groups. Group C had the highest incidence of vascular disease (15%). Diverticular disease and carcinoma were more common in groups B (37%) and C (52%). The amount of sedation in the groups did not significantly differ. Completion of the colonoscopy to the cecum or anastomotic sites did not differ among the groups (p > 0.05), nor did complication rates among groups (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Colonoscopy is safe in octogenarians and older patients. Age does not, by itself, confer an increased risk to the procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11344425     DOI: 10.1007/s004640000339

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  13 in total

1.  Multicentre study of surgical complications of colonoscopy.

Authors:  J R Garbay; B Suc; N Rotman; G Fourtanier; J Escat
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  How well can surgeons perform colonoscopy?

Authors:  S D Wexner; K A Forde; G Sellers; N Geron; A Lopes; E G Weiss; J J Nogueras
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Cancer statistics, 1999.

Authors:  S H Landis; T Murray; S Bolden; P A Wingo
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

4.  Age as a risk factor in colonoscopy: fact versus fiction.

Authors:  R E DiPrima; J S Barkin; M Blinder; R I Goldberg; R S Phillips
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  A prospective study of abdominal computerized tomography and colonoscopy in the diagnosis of colonic disease in an elderly population.

Authors:  G Lipscomb; G Loughrey; M Thakker; W Rees; D Nicholson
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.566

6.  Colonoscopy in the elderly: a study of 200 cases.

Authors:  P Chatrenet; P Friocourt; J P Ramain; M Cherrier; J B Maillard
Journal:  Eur J Med       Date:  1993 Aug-Sep

7.  Colonoscopy in patients aged 80 years or older and its contribution to the evaluation of rectal bleeding.

Authors:  L Bat; A Pines; E Shemesh; Y Levo; D Zeeli; E Scapa; Y Rosenblum
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.401

8.  Delay in diagnosis of colorectal cancer in elderly patients.

Authors:  M Kemppainen; I Räihä; T Rajala; L Sourander
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 10.668

9.  Towards safer colonoscopy: a report on the complications of 5000 diagnostic or therapeutic colonoscopies.

Authors:  F A Macrae; K G Tan; C B Williams
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Colonic investigations in the elderly: colonoscopy or barium enema?

Authors:  P Burtin; B Bour; T Charlois; O Ruget; P Calès; A Dauver; J Boyer
Journal:  Aging (Milano)       Date:  1995-08
View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Adverse events in older patients undergoing colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lukejohn W Day; Annette Kwon; John M Inadomi; Louise C Walter; Ma Somsouk
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Serious events in older Ontario residents receiving bowel preparations for outpatient colonoscopy with various comorbidity profiles: a descriptive, population-based study.

Authors:  Joanne Man-Wai Ho; Andrea Gruneir; Hadas D Fischer; Longdi Fu; Lorraine L Lipscombe; Chaim M Bell; Rodrigo B Cavalcanti; Geoffrey M Anderson; Paula A Rochon
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.522

Review 3.  Achieving the best bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Adolfo Parra-Blanco; Alex Ruiz; Manuel Alvarez-Lobos; Ana Amorós; Juan Cristóbal Gana; Patricio Ibáñez; Akiko Ono; Takahiro Fujii
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-21       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Performing colonoscopy in elderly and very elderly patients: Risks, costs and benefits.

Authors:  Otto S Lin
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-06-16

5.  Colonoscopy in the very elderly: a review of 157 cases.

Authors:  Marc Zerey; B Lauren Paton; Philip D Khan; Amy E Lincourt; Kent W Kercher; Frederick L Greene; B Todd Heniford
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 3.453

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.