Literature DB >> 11343179

Bedside percutaneous tracheostomy: clinical comparison of Griggs and Fantoni techniques.

C Byhahn1, H J Wilke, V Lischke, T Rinne, K Westphal.   

Abstract

Elective tracheostomy is widely considered the preferred airway management of patients on long-term ventilation. In addition to open tracheostomy, a number of percutaneous procedures have been introduced during the last two decades, among them techniques according to Griggs (guidewire dilating forceps, or GWDF) and to Fantoni (translaryngeal tracheostomy, or TLT). The aim of the study was to evaluate these two techniques in terms of perioperative complications, risks, and benefits in critically ill patients. A series of 100 critically ill adult patients on long-term ventilation underwent elective percutaneous tracheostomy, either according to the Griggs (n = 50) or Fantoni (n = 50) technique. Tracheostomy was performed under general anesthesia at the patient's bedside. The mean (+/-SD) operating times were short, 9.2 +/- 3.9 minutes (TLT) and 4.8 +/- 3.7 minutes (GWDF) on average. Perioperative complications were noted in 4% of patients during either TLT or GWDF and included massive bleeding, mediastinal emphysema, posterior tracheal wall injury, and pretracheal placement of the tracheostomy tube. With regard to oxygenation, pre- and postoperative arterial oxygen tension divided by the fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2) ratios did not vary significantly, and no perioperative hypoxia was noted regardless of the technique used. We conclude that both TLT and GWDF represent attractive, safe alternatives to conventional tracheostomy or other percutaneous procedures if carefully performed by experienced physicians and under bronchoscopic control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11343179     DOI: 10.1007/s002680020087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  5 in total

Review 1.  Percutaneous techniques versus surgical techniques for tracheostomy.

Authors:  Patrick Brass; Martin Hellmich; Angelika Ladra; Jürgen Ladra; Anna Wrzosek
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-07-20

2.  Fantoni translaryngeal tracheostomy versus ciaglia blue rhino percutaneous tracheostomy: a retrospective comparison.

Authors:  Duilio Divisi; Giuseppe Altamura; Sergio Di Tommaso; Gabriella Di Leonardo; Emilio Rosa; Carlo De Sanctis; Roberto Crisci
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Subglottic stenosis following percutaneous tracheostomy: a single centre report as a descriptive study.

Authors:  K Karvandian; A Jafarzadeh; A Hajipour; N Zolfaghari
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.124

Review 4.  Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy versus surgical tracheostomy in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Anthony Delaney; Sean M Bagshaw; Marek Nalos
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.097

5.  Percutaneous dilatation tracheostomy: which technique is the best for the critically ill patient, and how can we gather further scientific evidence?

Authors:  Ansgar Brambrink
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2004-09-08       Impact factor: 9.097

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.