Literature DB >> 11340666

Comparison of different schemes to treat long-range electrostatic interactions in molecular dynamics simulations of a protein crystal.

R Walser1, P H Hünenberger, W F van Gunsteren.   

Abstract

Eight molecular dynamics simulations of a ubiquitin crystal unit cell were performed to investigate the effect of different schemes to treat the long-range electrostatic interactions as well as the need to include counter ions. A crystal system was chosen as the test system, because the higher charge density compared with a protein in solution makes it more sensitive to the way of treating the electrostatic interactions. Three different schemes of treating the long-range interactions were compared: straight cutoff, reaction-field approximation, and a lattice-sum method (P3M). For each of these schemes, two simulations were performed, one with and one without the counter ions. Two additional simulations with a reaction-field force and different initial placements of the counter ions were performed to examine the effect of the initial positions of the ions. The inclusion of long-range electrostatic interactions using either a reaction-field or a lattice-sum method proved to be necessary for the simulation of crystals. These two schemes did not differ much in their ability to reproduce the crystallographic structure. The inclusion of counter ions, on the other hand, seems not necessary for obtaining a stable simulation. The initial positions of the ions have a visible but small effect on the simulation. Copyright 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11340666     DOI: 10.1002/prot.1062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  11 in total

1.  Conformational exchange in a membrane transport protein is altered in protein crystals.

Authors:  Daniel M Freed; Peter S Horanyi; Michael C Wiener; David S Cafiso
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Scrutinizing molecular mechanics force fields on the submicrosecond timescale with NMR data.

Authors:  Oliver F Lange; David van der Spoel; Bert L de Groot
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Effect of hexafluoroisopropanol alcohol on the structure of melittin: a molecular dynamics simulation study.

Authors:  Danilo Roccatano; Marco Fioroni; Martin Zacharias; Giorgio Colombo
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2005-09-09       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Membrane protein dynamics and detergent interactions within a crystal: a simulation study of OmpA.

Authors:  Peter J Bond; José D Faraldo-Gómez; Sundeep S Deol; Mark S P Sansom
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-06-09       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Patient-Specific Bone Multiscale Modelling, Fracture Simulation and Risk Analysis-A Survey.

Authors:  Amadeus C S de Alcântara; Israel Assis; Daniel Prada; Konrad Mehle; Stefan Schwan; Lucia Costa-Paiva; Munir S Skaf; Luiz C Wrobel; Paulo Sollero
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  Protein structure and dynamics in nonaqueous solvents: insights from molecular dynamics simulation studies.

Authors:  Cláudio M Soares; Vitor H Teixeira; António M Baptista
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Molecular dynamics simulation of the neuroglobin crystal: comparison with the simulation in solution.

Authors:  Massimiliano Anselmi; Maurizio Brunori; Beatrice Vallone; Alfredo Di Nola
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-07-18       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Macromolecular Crystals.

Authors:  David S Cerutti; David A Case
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Mol Sci       Date:  2018-11-16

Review 9.  Molecular dynamics: survey of methods for simulating the activity of proteins.

Authors:  Stewart A Adcock; J Andrew McCammon
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 60.622

10.  Dependence of protein crystal stability on residue charge states and ion content of crystal solvent.

Authors:  Antonija Kuzmanic; Bojan Zagrovic
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 4.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.