Literature DB >> 11339247

Molecular typing and long-term comparison of clostridium difficile strains by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and PCR-ribotyping.

P Spigaglia, R Cardines, S Rossi1, M G Menozzi1, P Mastrantonio.   

Abstract

Thirty-two related and 68 unrelated isolates of Clostridium difficile, isolated in different Italian hospitals since 1987, were analysed by PFGE and PCR-ribotyping to investigate their genetic relatedness. The isolates were classified into 28 groups by PFGE and 20 ribotypes by PCR-ribotyping. A single clone of C. difficile was recognised as the cause of three geographically and chronologically distant outbreaks. The correlation between PFGE and PCR-ribotyping results was good, with agreement for 77 (84%) of the 92 isolates typed by both methods. However, among sporadic isolates the discriminatory power of PFGE was more evident. Eight isolates that were untypable by PFGE could be analysed by PCR-ribotyping. The dendrograms generated showed that the genetic relatedness of the C. difficile isolates obtained by both techniques was comparable. The majority of the isolates in recent years appeared to be genetically unrelated to isolates from past infections. However, two clonal groups identified in all time periods had a common origin and this seems to indicate that they share some advantageous biological characteristics. The constant monitoring of C. difficile epidemiology will allow acquisition of further important data on this nosocomial pathogen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11339247     DOI: 10.1099/0022-1317-50-5-407

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Microbiol        ISSN: 0022-2615            Impact factor:   2.472


  7 in total

1.  Evaluation of repetitive element sequence-based PCR as a molecular typing method for Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Patrizia Spigaglia; Paola Mastrantonio
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Molecular analysis of the pathogenicity locus and polymorphism in the putative negative regulator of toxin production (TcdC) among Clostridium difficile clinical isolates.

Authors:  Patrizia Spigaglia; Paola Mastrantonio
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  The A, B, BI, and Cs of Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Erik R Dubberke
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  Multilocus sequence typing analysis of human and animal Clostridium difficile isolates of various toxigenic types.

Authors:  Ludovic Lemee; Anne Dhalluin; Martine Pestel-Caron; Jean-François Lemeland; Jean-Louis Pons
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Molecular analysis of Clostridium difficile at a university teaching hospital in Japan: a shift in the predominant type over a five-year period.

Authors:  E Sawabe; H Kato; K Osawa; T Chida; N Tojo; Y Arakawa; N Okamura
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 6.  Newer diagnostic tests for bacterial diseases.

Authors:  B D Bhatia; Sriparna Basu
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.967

7.  Typing Clostridium difficile strains based on tandem repeat sequences.

Authors:  N Henning Zaiss; Maja Rupnik; Ed J Kuijper; Celine Harmanus; Dolf Michielsen; Koen Janssens; Ulrich Nübel
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2009-01-08       Impact factor: 3.605

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.