Literature DB >> 11336204

Information limit on the spatial integration of local orientation signals.

S C Dakin1.   

Abstract

Channel-based models of human spatial vision require that the output of spatial filters be pooled across space. This pooling yields global estimates of local feature attributes such as orientation that are useful in situations in which that attribute may be locally variable, as is the case for visual texture. The spatial characteristics of orientation summation are considered in the study. By assessing the effect of orientation variability on observers' ability to estimate the mean orientation of spatially unstructured textures, one can determine both the internal noise on each orientation sample and the number of samples being pooled. By a combination of fixing and covarying the size of textured regions and the number of elements constituting them, one can then assess the effects of the texture's size, density, and numerosity (the number of elements present) on the internal noise and the sampling density. Results indicate that internal noise shows a primary dependence on texture density but that, counterintuitively, subjects rely on a sample size approximately equal to a fixed power of the number of samples present, regardless of their spatial arrangement. Orientation pooling is entirely flexible with respect to the position of input features.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11336204     DOI: 10.1364/josaa.18.001016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis        ISSN: 1084-7529            Impact factor:   2.129


  33 in total

1.  The perceptual processing capacity of summary statistics between and within feature dimensions.

Authors:  Mouna Attarha; Cathleen M Moore
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Combining priors and noisy visual cues in a rapid pointing task.

Authors:  Hadley Tassinari; Todd E Hudson; Michael S Landy
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-10-04       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Visual estimation under risk.

Authors:  Michael S Landy; Ross Goutcher; Julia Trommershäuser; Pascal Mamassian
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-04-12       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Age-related changes in fine motion direction discriminations.

Authors:  Nadejda Bocheva; Donka Angelova; Miroslava Stefanova
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-05-26       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Efficiencies for the statistics of size discrimination.

Authors:  Joshua A Solomon; Michael Morgan; Charles Chubb
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Local motion processing limits fine direction discrimination in the periphery.

Authors:  Isabelle Mareschal; Peter J Bex; Steven C Dakin
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-06-16       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Roles of saliency and set size in ensemble averaging.

Authors:  Aleksei U Iakovlev; Igor S Utochkin
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Contributions of ensemble perception to outlier representation precision.

Authors:  Burcu Avci; Aysecan Boduroglu
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Inflation versus filling-in: why we feel we see more than we actually do in peripheral vision.

Authors:  Brian Odegaard; Min Yu Chang; Hakwan Lau; Sing-Hang Cheung
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Dissociable effects of attention and crowding on orientation averaging.

Authors:  Steven C Dakin; Peter J Bex; John R Cass; Roger J Watt
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.