Literature DB >> 11335954

Accuracy evaluation of a CAS system: laboratory protocol and results with 6D localizers, and clinical experiences in otorhinolaryngology.

S Schmerber1, F Chassat.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study reported in this article was to evaluate (1) localizer inaccuracies, one of the major sources of errors in Computer-Assisted Surgery (CAS) systems, and (2) the final errors obtained using surface-based registration in ear, nose, and throat (ENT) surgery. These objectives were met through (1) a technical evaluation of the accuracy and usability of several optical localizers under laboratory test conditions, and (2) a clinical measure of the global errors obtained when using a CAS system including one of the standard localizer systems (Flashpoint 5000) in Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (FESS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The technical evaluation of localizers consisted of series of geometric tests on four commercial systems. Clinical evaluation included the development of a laboratory CAS system using a markerless, skin surface registration method. This was based on a standard optical digitizing system (Flashpoint 5000), which eliminates the need for the second CT scan, which is normally performed specifically to process the position of the fiducial markers. Global accuracy was then evaluated on 20 patients by subjective and visual comparison when placing a calibrated pointer on anatomical landmarks.
RESULTS: The results of the technical study indicate that the four commercial systems tested have levels of inaccuracy deemed acceptable for most CAS applications, including ENT surgery. The clinical study obtained a registration and calibration accuracy of less than 1.5 mm in 89.2% (SD = 0.20 mm) of the cases studied. Our markerless skin surface points registration method is reliable, and allows patient head movements during the procedure. The accuracy tests performed show that this type of system can be used for ENT surgery with satisfaction.
CONCLUSION: CAS systems enable the surgeon to have a more thorough understanding of the complicated anatomy of paranasal sinuses, and may be especially helpful in revision surgery when normal anatomic landmarks are lacking. Further studies are necessary in FESS to improve the CAS systems that are currently available, and to determine whether these systems can minimize the overall risk of complications. Copyright 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11335954     DOI: 10.1002/igs.1005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Aided Surg        ISSN: 1092-9088


  9 in total

1.  [Accuracy and precision in the evaluation of computer assisted surgical systems. A definition].

Authors:  G Strauss; M Hofer; W Korb; C Trantakis; D Winkler; O Burgert; T Schulz; A Dietz; J Meixensberger; K Koulechov
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  [Workflow analysis to assess the efficiency of intraoperative technology using the example of functional endoscopic sinus surgery].

Authors:  G Strauss; M Fischer; J Meixensberger; V Falk; C Trantakis; D Winkler; F Bootz; O Burgert; A Dietz; H U Lemke
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  [Computer-assisted surgery of the frontal skull base].

Authors:  G Strauss
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 4.  Navigated laparoscopic ultrasound in abdominal soft tissue surgery: technological overview and perspectives.

Authors:  Thomas Langø; Sinara Vijayan; Anna Rethy; Cecilie Våpenstad; Ole Vegard Solberg; Ronald Mårvik; Gjermund Johnsen; Toril N Hernes
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2011-09-03       Impact factor: 2.924

5.  Effect of improved navigation performance on the accuracy of implant placement in total hip arthroplasty with a CT-based navigation system.

Authors:  Ichiro Nakahara; Takayuki Kyo; Yasuo Kuroda; Hidenobu Miki
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 1.731

6.  Calcaneal osteotomy preoperative planning system with 3D full-sized computer-assisted technology.

Authors:  Yi-Jiun Chou; Shuh-Ping Sun; Hsin-Hua Liu
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 4.460

7.  [Clinical experience with navigation functions for temporal bone surgery : interim result after 40 patients].

Authors:  G Strauß; S Schaller; S Nowatschin; T Wenger; M Hofer; J Meixensberger; A Dietz; T Lüth
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.284

8.  On mixed reality environments for minimally invasive therapy guidance: systems architecture, successes and challenges in their implementation from laboratory to clinic.

Authors:  Cristian A Linte; Katherine P Davenport; Kevin Cleary; Craig Peters; Kirby G Vosburgh; Nassir Navab; Philip Eddie Edwards; Pierre Jannin; Terry M Peters; David R Holmes; Richard A Robb
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 4.790

9.  Quantitative error analysis for computer assisted navigation: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Ö Güler; M Perwög; F Kral; F Schwarm; Z R Bárdosi; G Göbel; W Freysinger
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.071

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.