Literature DB >> 11334274

Transcranial electrical motor evoked potential monitoring for brain tumor resection.

H H Zhou1, P J Kelly.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to examine whether transcranial electrical motor evoked potential (MEP) monitoring is safe, feasible, and valuable for brain tumor surgery.
METHODS: Fifty consecutive patients undergoing brain tumor resection were studied, using nitrous oxide/propofol anesthesia. MEPs were continuously recorded throughout surgery, using a Sentinel 4 evoked potential system (Axon Systems, Inc., Hauppauge, NY). The MEPs were elicited by transcranial electrical stimulation (train of 5; stimulation rate, 0.5-2 Hz; square wave pulse with a time constant of 0.5 ms; stimulation intensity, 40-160 mA) through spiral electrodes placed over the primary motor cortex and were recorded by needle electrodes inserted into the contralateral orbicularis oris, biceps, abductor pollicis brevis, and anterior tibialis muscles. When MEP amplitudes decreased by more than 50%, MEP stimulation was repeated, with increased stimulation intensity, and MEP changes were reported to the surgeon. The motor function of each patient was examined before and after surgery, using a reproducible scale. The relationship between MEP amplitude decreases and worsening motor status was analyzed using linear regression.
RESULTS: Preoperative neurological examinations revealed mild to moderate motor deficits (2/5 to 4/5) for 38% of patients (19 of 50 patients). Most of the patients (96%) exhibited recordable baseline MEPs. Persistent MEP decreases of more than 50% were noted for eight patients (16%) (11 muscles). The MEPs were completely abolished in two patients (three muscles). The degree of postoperative worsening of motor status was correlated with the degree of intraoperative MEP amplitude reduction (r = -0.864; P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Persistent intraoperative MEP reductions of more than 50% were associated with postoperative motor deficits. The degree of MEP amplitude reduction was correlated with postoperative worsening of motor status. Transcranial electrical MEP monitoring is feasible, safe, and valuable for brain tumor surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11334274     DOI: 10.1097/00006123-200105000-00021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  15 in total

1.  Predicted current densities in the brain during transcranial electrical stimulation.

Authors:  R N Holdefer; R Sadleir; M J Russell
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-04-27       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Combined motor and somatosensory evoked potentials for intraoperative monitoring: intra- and postoperative data in a series of 69 operations.

Authors:  M R Weinzierl; P Reinacher; J M Gilsbach; V Rohde
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2007-01-13       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 3.  Intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring: overview and update.

Authors:  David B Macdonald
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2006-07-11       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 4.  Intraoperative neurophysiology of the motor system in children: a tailored approach.

Authors:  Francesco Sala; Paolo Manganotti; Stefan Grossauer; Vincenzo Tramontanto; Carlo Mazza; Massimo Gerosa
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 1.475

5.  Comparison of effectiveness between cork-screw and peg-screw electrodes for transcranial motor evoked potential monitoring using the finite element method.

Authors:  Ryosuke Tomio; Takenori Akiyama; Takayuki Ohira; Kazunari Yoshida
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2016-11-11

Review 6.  A practical guide for anesthetic management during intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring.

Authors:  Masahiko Kawaguchi; Hiroki Iida; Satoshi Tanaka; Naokazu Fukuoka; Hironobu Hayashi; Shunsuke Izumi; Kenji Yoshitani; Manabu Kakinohana
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2019-10-19       Impact factor: 2.078

7.  Surgical management of medulla oblongata hemangioblastomas in one institution: an analysis of 62 cases.

Authors:  Xuesong Liu; Yuekang Zhang; Xuhui Hui; Chao You; Fang Yuan; Wenjing Chen; Si Zhang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-04-15

8.  Improving successful rate of transcranial electrical motor-evoked potentials monitoring during spinal surgery in young children.

Authors:  Junlin Yang; Zifang Huang; Haihua Shu; Yuguang Chen; Xinrui Sun; Weifeng Liu; Yunling Dou; Chaofan Xie; Xiang Lin; Yong Hu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Transzygomatic approach with intraoperative neuromonitoring for resection of middle cranial fossa tumors.

Authors:  Byung Chul Son; Sang Won Lee; Sup Kim; Jae Taek Hong; Jae Hoon Sung; Seung-Ho Yang
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2012-02

Review 10.  Functional Mapping for Glioma Surgery, Part 2: Intraoperative Mapping Tools.

Authors:  Ramin A Morshed; Jacob S Young; Anthony T Lee; Shawn L Hervey-Jumper
Journal:  Neurosurg Clin N Am       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 2.509

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.