Literature DB >> 11332334

The effect duration of candesartan cilexetil once daily, in comparison with enalapril once daily, in patients with mild to moderate hypertension.

A Himmelmann1, S Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi, A Wester, J Redón, R Asmar, T Hedner.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the antihypertensive efficacy, effect duration and safety of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker candesartan cilexetil and the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril once daily in patients with mild to moderate hypertension.
METHODS: A multicenter, randomised, double-blind parallel group study was performed in Finland, France, the Netherlands, Spain and Sweden. Three-hundred-and-ninety-five men and women in the age range 20-80 years with primary hypertension were randomised to an 8-week double-blind treatment period with either candesartan cilexetil 8-16 mg or enalapril 10-20 mg once daily, with forced dose titration after 4 weeks. Non-invasive ambulatory blood pressure was measured for 36 h at baseline and after 8 weeks. The primary efficacy variable was the change in mean diastolic and systolic ambulatory blood pressure 22-24 h post-dose.
RESULTS: There was a significant difference in the adjusted mean difference for the change from baseline to week 8 between candesartan cilexetil and enalapril 22-24 h post-dose by -3.5 mmHg (95% confidence interval, CI: -6.8 to -0.3 mmHg; p < 0.032) in ambulatory systolic blood pressure and -3.0 mmHg (95% CI: -5.1 to -0.8 mmHg; p < 0.008) in ambulatory diastolic blood pressure. There was a significant difference in adjusted mean daytime ambulatory blood pressure 24-36 h post-dose by -4.2 mmHg (95% CI: -6.8 to -1.6 mmHg; p < 0.002)/-3.5 mmHg (95% CI: -5.1 to -1.8 mmHg; p < 0.001). Both drugs were generally well tolerated.
CONCLUSION: The results of the present study suggest that advantages may be attributed to the use of candesartan cilexetil, as compared to enalapril in the treatment of patients with essential hypertension. In comparison with enalapril 20 mg, candesartan cilexetil 16 mg more effectively lowered blood pressure at trough and in particular on the day following the day after the last dose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11332334     DOI: 10.1080/080370501750183381

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Press        ISSN: 0803-7051            Impact factor:   2.835


  7 in total

1.  Quantification of Candesartan in Mouse Plasma by MALDI-TOFMS and in Tissue Sections by MALDI-Imaging Using the Stable-Isotope Dilution Technique.

Authors:  Toyofumi Nakanishi; Shinji Takai; Denan Jin; Takayuki Takubo
Journal:  Mass Spectrom (Tokyo)       Date:  2013-06-01

Review 2.  An overview of candesartan in clinical practice.

Authors:  Zeeshan Khawaja; Christopher S Wilcox
Journal:  Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther       Date:  2011-08

Review 3.  Candesartan cilexetil: an update of its use in essential hypertension.

Authors:  Stephanie E Easthope; Blair Jarvis
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Candesartan cilexetil: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in chronic heart failure and hypertension.

Authors:  Greg L Plosker; Susan J Keam
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  A systematic review and network meta-analysis of the comparative efficacy of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers in hypertension.

Authors:  Chrisa Dimou; Christina Antza; Evangelos Akrivos; Ioannis Doundoulakis; Stella Stabouli; Anna Bettina Haidich; Vasilios Kotsis
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 3.012

6.  Candesartan cilexetil/hydrochlorothiazide combination treatment versus high-dose candesartan cilexetil monotherapy in patients with mild to moderate cardiovascular risk (CHILI Triple T).

Authors:  Gerd Bönner; Bernhard Landers; Peter Bramlage
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2011-02-17

Review 7.  Management of hypertension with fixed dose combinations of candesartan cilexetil and hydrochlorothiazide: patient perspectives and clinical utility.

Authors:  Thomas Mengden; Sakir Uen; Peter Bramlage
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2009-12-29
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.