Literature DB >> 11332141

Clinical impact of histologic subtypes in localized non-anaplastic nephroblastoma treated according to the trial and study SIOP-9/GPOH.

A Weirich1, I Leuschner, D Harms, G M Vujanic, J Tröger, U Abel, N Graf, D Schmidt, R Ludwig, P A Voûte.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Histologic subtypes of standard histology Wilms' tumor (WT) and the effect of preoperative therapy on their clinical and histologic features, deserve to be analysed in respect to outcome to find an adequate baseline for therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The German Society of Paediatric Oncology & Haematology enrolled patients from January 1989 to March 1994 for therapy according the International Society of Paediatric Oncology trial & study 9. Standardised preoperative therapy with dactinomycin and vincristine for 4-8 weeks was generally applied in patients between 0.5 and 16 years with localized renal tumors and imaging typical for WT. In 99.5% of cases representative material was sent for review to the Kiel Paediatric Tumour Registry. For prospective subtyping of 329 WT (258 after preoperative therapy, 71 with immediate surgery) modified Beckwith & Palmer criteria were used. Reduction in volume measured by imaging prior to chemotherapy and surgery was used to assess response (poor response: reduction < 40%; good response: reduction > or = 40%).
RESULTS: There were 39% of patients treated with immediate surgery and 12.4% of patients with preoperative therapy in the age group up to 12 months. The difference in age (P = 0.022) was linked with different amounts of epithelial WT (15.5% vs. 3.1%), median age: 0.58 and 0.93 years. Due to the effect of chemotherapy the amount of other WT changed: stromal 0% to 14%, mixed 45.1% to 29.4%, blastemal 39.4% to 9.3%). After preoperative therapy 37.6% of WT were predominantly regressive, 6.6% completely necrotic. Poor response was frequent in differentiated WT (86% of stromal, 75% of epithelial WT) but none relapsed. In the other WT with viable tumor left after preoperative therapy > 70% had good response, poor response was a risk factor (P = 0.0057).
CONCLUSIONS: Subtyping according modified Beckwith & Palmer can be used in WT after preoperative therapy to stratify postoperative therapy in future. A milder therapy could be tested in differentiated WT at low stages and an intensified in the others with viable tumor left and poor response, i.e., mainly blastemal WT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11332141     DOI: 10.1023/a:1011167924230

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  27 in total

Review 1.  Current management of wilms' tumor.

Authors:  Leah Nakamura; Michael Ritchey
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Nephron-sparing surgery for Wilms tumor: A systematic review.

Authors:  Rand N Wilcox Vanden Berg; Emily N Bierman; Megan Van Noord; Henry E Rice; Jonathan C Routh
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 3.498

3.  Fine-needle aspiration cytopathology in the diagnosis of Wilms tumor.

Authors:  I Fernández-Pineda; R Cabello; J A García-Cantón; S Pérez-Bertolez; I Tuduri; G Ramírez; C Márquez; J C de Agustín
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.405

4.  Outcome and Prognostic Factors in Stage III Favorable-Histology Wilms Tumor: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group Study AREN0532.

Authors:  Conrad V Fernandez; Elizabeth A Mullen; Yueh-Yun Chi; Peter F Ehrlich; Elizabeth J Perlman; John A Kalapurakal; Geetika Khanna; Arnold C Paulino; Thomas E Hamilton; Kenneth W Gow; Zelig Tochner; Fredric A Hoffer; Janice S Withycombe; Robert C Shamberger; Yeonil Kim; James I Geller; James R Anderson; Paul E Grundy; Jeffrey S Dome
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Glypican-3 mRNA expression level in Wilms tumor: correlation with histological type, stage, and outcome.

Authors:  Md Nahidul Wari; Archana George Vallonthaiel; Aijaz Ahmed; Deepali Saxena; Venkateswaran K Iyer; Sandeep R Mathur; Sandeep Agarwala; Sameer Bakhshi; V Srinivas; P Chattopadhyaya; Arundhati Sharma; S Datta Gupta; Amit Dinda
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 1.827

6.  Subsets of very low risk Wilms tumor show distinctive gene expression, histologic, and clinical features.

Authors:  Simone T Sredni; Samantha Gadd; Chiang-Ching Huang; Norman Breslow; Paul Grundy; Daniel M Green; Jeffrey S Dome; Robert C Shamberger; J Bruce Beckwith; Elizabeth J Perlman
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Management of Wilms' tumor: NWTS vs SIOP.

Authors:  Sushmita Bhatnagar
Journal:  J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg       Date:  2009-01

8.  Image-based surgical risk factors for Wilms tumor.

Authors:  Takaharu Oue; Akihiro Yoneda; Noriaki Usui; Takashi Sasaki; Masahiro Zenitani; Natsumi Tanaka; Shuichiro Uehara; Soji Ibuka; Yuichi Takama; Hiroomi Okuyama
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 1.827

9.  Outcome of pediatric renal tumor treated using the Japan Wilms Tumor Study-1 (JWiTS-1) protocol: a report from the JWiTS group.

Authors:  Takaharu Oue; Masahiro Fukuzawa; Hajime Okita; Hideo Mugishima; Hiroshi Horie; Jun-ichi Hata; Masahiro Saito; Miwako Nozaki; Motoaki Chin; Hisaya Nakadate; Shiro Hinotsu; Tsugumichi Koshinaga; Yasuhiko Kaneko; Yoshihiro Kitano; Yukichi Tanaka
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 10.  Wilms tumour: prognostic factors, staging, therapy and late effects.

Authors:  Sue C Kaste; Jeffrey S Dome; Paul S Babyn; Norbert M Graf; Paul Grundy; Jan Godzinski; Gill A Levitt; Helen Jenkinson
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2007-11-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.