Literature DB >> 11331148

The ability of environmental context to facilitate psychomotor sensitization to amphetamine can be dissociated from its effect on acute drug responsiveness and on conditioned responding.

H S Crombag1, A Badiani, J Chan, J Dell'Orco, S P Dineen, T E Robinson.   

Abstract

Doses of amphetamine or cocaine that fail to induce psychomotor sensitization when given to a rat in its home cage can produce robust sensitization if given immediately following placement into a relatively novel, distinct environment. A drug-associated context can serve as a conditioned stimulus, and therefore may promote robust sensitization by facilitating associative learning processes. We examined this hypothesis by habituating rats to the test environment for 1 or 6--8 hr prior to each drug injection, which degrades the ability of environmental context to serve as an effective conditioned stimulus. When 0.5 mg/kg of amphetamine was administered intravenously immediately after placement into a distinct environment there was a large acute psychomotor response (rotational behavior) on the first test day, and robust sensitization developed with repeated daily injections. When the same treatment was administered in the home cage, there was a small acute response and no sensitization developed. The enhanced acute response seen in the distinct environment was significantly attenuated by 1 hr of habituation to the test environment, and completely abolished by 6--8 hr of habituation. Also, as little as 1 hr of habituation completely prevented the development of a conditioned rotational response. In contrast, neither 1 nor 6--8 hr of habituation had any effect on the ability of amphetamine to induce robust behavioral sensitization. It is concluded that the ability of a distinct environment to facilitate sensitization to amphetamine can be dissociated from its effect on acute drug responsiveness and from the ability of drug-associated environmental stimuli to elicit a conditioned response. Possible mechanisms by which a distinct environment facilitates sensitization are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11331148     DOI: 10.1016/S0893-133X(00)00238-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology        ISSN: 0893-133X            Impact factor:   7.853


  25 in total

1.  Methamphetamine-induced behavioral and physiological effects in adolescent and adult HIV-1 transgenic rats.

Authors:  Marley D Kass; Xiangqian Liu; Michael Vigorito; Linda Chang; Sulie L Chang
Journal:  J Neuroimmune Pharmacol       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  A cocaine cue is more preferred and evokes more frequency-modulated 50-kHz ultrasonic vocalizations in rats prone to attribute incentive salience to a food cue.

Authors:  Paul J Meyer; Sean T Ma; Terry E Robinson
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 3.  Motivational Processes Underlying Substance Abuse Disorder.

Authors:  Paul J Meyer; Christopher P King; Carrie R Ferrario
Journal:  Curr Top Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016

4.  Interactions among ovarian hormones and time of testing on behavioral sensitization and cocaine self-administration.

Authors:  Hongyan Yang; Wei Zhao; Ming Hu; Jill B Becker
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2007-07-12       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  H3 receptor blockade by thioperamide enhances cognition in rats without inducing locomotor sensitization.

Authors:  Victoria A Komater; Kaitlin E Browman; Peter Curzon; Arthur A Hancock; Michael W Decker; Gerard B Fox
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2003-04-08       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Optogenetic Central Amygdala Stimulation Intensifies and Narrows Motivation for Cocaine.

Authors:  Shelley M Warlow; Mike J F Robinson; Kent C Berridge
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Transient disruption of attentional performance following escalating amphetamine administration in rats.

Authors:  Robyn L Kondrad; Joshua A Burk
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Effects of the MEK inhibitor, SL-327, on rewarding, motor- and cellular-activating effects of D-amphetamine and SKF-82958, and their augmentation by food restriction in rat.

Authors:  Kenneth D Carr; Soledad Cabeza de Vaca; Yanjie Sun; Lily S Chau; Yan Pan; Julie Dela Cruz
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Effects of dizocilpine [(+)-MK-801] on the expression of associative and non-associative sensitization to D-amphetamine.

Authors:  M Grönig; A Atalla; K Kuschinsky
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2003-12-12       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 10.  Behavioral characteristics and neurobiological substrates shared by Pavlovian sign-tracking and drug abuse.

Authors:  Arthur Tomie; Kathryn L Grimes; Larissa A Pohorecky
Journal:  Brain Res Rev       Date:  2007-12-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.