Literature DB >> 11330582

Prognostic value of K-ras mutations and allelic imbalance on chromosome 18q in patients with resected colorectal cancer.

A Font1, A Abad, M Monzó, J J Sanchez, M Guillot, J L Manzano, M Piñol, I Ojanguren, R Rosell.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We designed this study to assess the frequency of K-ras mutations in patients with resected colorectal tumors and their association with survival. A second objective was to analyze the prognostic value of different K-ras genotypes. In a subgroup of patients we also investigated the presence of allelic imbalance on chromosome 18q and its relationship to clinical outcome.
METHODS: One hundred fourteen colorectal tumors resected between 1983 and 1986 were analyzed to detect K-ras point mutations at codons 12, 13, and 61 by polymerase chain reaction followed by allele specific oligonucleotide hybridization. A subgroup of 77 tumors was further screened to detect loss of heterozygosity on chromosome 18q using three polymorphic microsatellite markers (D18S67, D18S474 and D18S58).
RESULTS: K-ras mutations were detected in 29 percent (33/114) of patients. K-ras mutations correlated with age and preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen levels, and there was some indication that they may be linked to poor survival, especially in Stage II tumors, where a subgroup of patients with aspartic and serine mutations showed significantly reduced survival (P = 0.03) compared with K-ras-negative patients. 18q loss of heterozygosity was present in 39 percent (25/63) of tumors. A multivariate analysis of Stage II tumors showed that 18q loss of heterozygosity was significantly associated with a worse prognosis (P = 0.006). A significant decrease in survival was identified in ten patients harboring both genetic alterations (K-i mutations and 18q loss of heterozygosity; P = 0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: In colorectal tumors, K-ras mutations and 18q loss of heterozygosity are two genetic markers which may identify patients with more aggressive behavior, mainly in Stage II tumors. These findings warrant further research, because they can be useful in customizing adjuvant chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11330582     DOI: 10.1007/BF02234328

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  10 in total

1.  Microsatellite instability and loss of heterozygosity at chromosomal location 18q: prospective evaluation of biomarkers for stages II and III colon cancer--a study of CALGB 9581 and 89803.

Authors:  Monica M Bertagnolli; Mark Redston; Carolyn C Compton; Donna Niedzwiecki; Robert J Mayer; Richard M Goldberg; Thomas A Colacchio; Leonard B Saltz; Robert S Warren
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-07-11       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Molecular inversion probe analysis of gene copy alterations reveals distinct categories of colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Hanlee Ji; Jochen Kumm; Michael Zhang; Kyle Farnam; Keyan Salari; Malek Faham; James M Ford; Ronald W Davis
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 3.  A review of the most promising biomarkers in colorectal cancer: one step closer to targeted therapy.

Authors:  Vanessa Deschoolmeester; Marc Baay; Pol Specenier; Filip Lardon; Jan B Vermorken
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2010-06-28

4.  Loss of heterozygosity: an independent prognostic factor of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Shih-Ching Chang; Jen-Kou Lin; Tzu-Chen Lin; Wen-Yih Liang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-02-14       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Prognostic values of chromosome 18q microsatellite alterations in stage II colonic carcinoma.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Guo-Qiang Wang; Xiao-Wei Sun; Gong Chen; Yuan-Fang Li; Li-Yi Zhang; Hai-Bo Qiu; Chun-Yu Huang; You-Qing Zhan; Zhi-Wei Zhou
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Survival in ampullary cancer: potential role of different KRAS mutations.

Authors:  Nakul P Valsangkar; Thun Ingkakul; Camilo Correa-Gallego; Mari Mino-Kenudson; Ricard Masia; Keith D Lillemoe; Carlos Fernández-del Castillo; Andrew L Warshaw; Andrew S Liss; Sarah P Thayer
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  A novel multiplexing, polymerase chain reaction-based assay for the analysis of chromosome 18q status in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Nadina Erill; Anna Colomer; Miquel Calvo; August Vidal; Ruth Román; Montse Verdú; Carlos Cordón-Cardó; Xavier Puig
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.568

Review 8.  Molecular lesions in colorectal cancer: impact on prognosis? Original data and review of the literature.

Authors:  B Klump; O Nehls; T Okech; C-J Hsieh; V Gaco; F S Gittinger; M Sarbia; F Borchard; A Greschniok; H H Gruenagel; R Porschen; M Gregor
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2003-06-21       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Genetic-based biomarkers and next-generation sequencing: the future of personalized care in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Redecca Y Kim; Hua Xu; Samuel Myllykangas; Hanlee Ji
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 2.512

10.  Tumor suppressor gene hypermethylation as a predictor of gastric stromal tumor behavior.

Authors:  Michael G House; MingZhou Guo; David T Efron; Keith D Lillemoe; John L Cameron; James E Syphard; Craig M Hooker; Susan C Abraham; Elizabeth A Montgomery; James G Herman; Malcolm V Brock
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.267

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.