Literature DB >> 11330540

Uni- and multi-variate analysis of risk factors for early and late hepatic artery thrombosis after liver transplantation.

C K Oh1, S J Pelletier, R G Sawyer, A R Dacus, C S McCullough, T L Pruett, H A Sanfey.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) is a significant cause of morbidity after liver transplantation. The aims of this study are to identify and compare risk factors that might contribute to HAT.
METHODS: A total of 424 liver transplants performed at the University of Virginia were reviewed. HAT was defined as complete disruption of arterial blood flow to the allograft and was identified in 29 cases (6.8%). HAT was classified as early (less than 1 month posttransplant, 9 cases: 2.1%) or late (more than 1 month posttransplant, 20 cases: 5.4%). Possible risk factors for HAT were analyzed using Pearson chi2 test for univariate analysis and logistic regression for multivariate analysis.
RESULTS: Multiple transplants, recipient/donor weight ratio >1.25, biopsy-proven rejection within 1 week of transplant, recipient negative cytomegalovirus (CMV) status, arterial anastomosis to an old conduit (defined as a previously constructed aorto-hepatic artery remnant using donor iliac artery), and CMV negative patients receiving allograft from CMV positive donors were found to be significant risk factors for developing early HAT. After logistic regression, factors independently predicting early HAT included arterial anastomosis to an old conduit [odds ratio (OR)=7.33], recipient/donor weight ratio >1.25 (OR=5.65), biopsy-proven rejection within 1 week posttransplant (OR=2.81), and donor positive and recipient negative CMV status (OR=2.66). Female donor, the combination of female donor and male recipient, recipient hepatitis C-related liver disease, donor negative CMV status, and the combination of recipient CMV negative and donor CMV negative were found to be significant risk factors for late HAT. Factors independently predicting late HAT by logistic regression included negative recipient and donor CMV status (OR=2.26) and the combination of a female donor and male recipient (OR=1.97).
CONCLUSION: Therefore, in nonemergency situations attention to these factors in donor allocation may minimize the possibility of HAT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11330540     DOI: 10.1097/00007890-200103270-00014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  24 in total

Review 1.  [Vascular reconstruction in visceral transplantation surgery].

Authors:  P Olschewski; D Seehofer; R Öllinger; J Pratschke
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 2.  Vascular complications following liver transplantation: A literature review of advances in 2015.

Authors:  Tullio Piardi; Martin Lhuaire; Onorina Bruno; Riccardo Memeo; Patrick Pessaux; Reza Kianmanesh; Daniele Sommacale
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2016-01-08

3.  A Remembrance of Procedures Past: Late Hepatic Artery Thrombosis.

Authors:  Robert Andrews; Thomas Queen; Joseph Alcorn; Denis McCarthy
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 4.  Iatrogenic-related transplant injuries: the role of the interventional radiologist.

Authors:  Alexander Copelan; Daniel George; Baljendra Kapoor; Hahn Vu Nghiem; Jonathan M Lorenz; Brian Erly; Weiping Wang
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.513

5.  The effect of Doppler ultrasound on early vascular interventions and clinical outcomes after liver transplantation.

Authors:  Hannah Lee; Chae-Won Lim; Seok Ha Yoo; Chang-Hoon Koo; Woo-Il Kwon; Kyung-Suk Suh; Ho Geol Ryu
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Feasibility and limits of split liver transplantation from pediatric donors: an italian multicenter experience.

Authors:  Matteo Cescon; Marco Spada; Michele Colledan; Giuliano Torre; Enzo Andorno; Umberto Valente; Giorgio Rossi; Paolo Reggiani; Umberto Cillo; Umberto Baccarani; Gian Luca Grazi; Giuseppe Tisone; Franco Filipponi; Massimo Rossi; Giuseppe Maria Ettorre; Mauro Salizzoni; Oreste Cuomo; Tullia De Feo; Bruno Gridelli
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Risk factors of hepatic artery thrombosis in pediatric deceased donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  Nan Ma; Zhuolun Song; Chong Dong; Chao Sun; Xingchu Meng; Wei Zhang; Kai Wang; Bin Wu; Shanni Li; Hong Qin; Chao Han; Haohao Li; Wei Gao; Zhongyang Shen
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2019-06-15       Impact factor: 1.827

8.  Pre-transplant portal vein thrombosis is an independent risk factor for graft loss due to hepatic artery thrombosis in liver transplant recipients.

Authors:  Jonathan G Stine; Shawn J Pelletier; Timothy M Schmitt; Robert J Porte; Patrick G Northup
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 3.647

9.  Acute paranoid psychosis as sole clinical presentation of hepatic artery thrombosis after living donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  Armin D Goralczyk; Volker Meier; Giuliano Ramadori; Aiman Obed; Thomas Lorf
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Dorsal approach plus branch patch technique is the preferred method for liver transplanting small babies with monosegmental grafts.

Authors:  Yukihiro Sanada; Shuji Hishikawa; Noriki Okada; Naoya Yamada; Takumi Katano; Yuta Hirata; Yoshiyuki Ihara; Taizen Urahashi; Koichi Mizuta
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 3.445

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.