Literature DB >> 25123179

The effect of Doppler ultrasound on early vascular interventions and clinical outcomes after liver transplantation.

Hannah Lee1, Chae-Won Lim, Seok Ha Yoo, Chang-Hoon Koo, Woo-Il Kwon, Kyung-Suk Suh, Ho Geol Ryu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: During the immediate postoperative period after liver transplantation (LT), postoperative bleeding and vascular complications (stenosis, thrombosis) are the two most common complications that require therapeutic decisions. Doppler ultrasound (DUS) is the established method for screening vascular patency after LT during the immediate postoperative period. The objective of our study was to evaluate the impact of DUS performed on postoperative days (POD) 1 and 2 on early vascular interventions.
METHODS: We studied 200 patients who had undergone living donor or deceased donor liver transplantation between January 2011 and March 2012. Postoperative liver DUS findings of up to POD 14, including patency of hepatic artery, portal vein, and hepatic vein, were retrieved. Patients with normal DUS findings on POD 1 and POD 2 were classified as the normal early DUS group. Patients with abnormal DUS findings at POD1 or POD2 were classified as the abnormal early DUS group. Frequency of vascular interventions was compared between the two groups. Risk factors that predict vascular interventions also were assessed.
RESULTS: On POD 1 and 2, 81.5 % (163/200) had normal DUS findings and management was not altered by subsequent DUS findings. Two patients in the normal group were found to have hepatic artery dissection and hepatic vein thrombosis on routine CT on POD 7 and received vascular intervention. DUS results in the two patients were normal until POD 6, but DUS performed after the CT on POD 7 were consistent with the CT findings. Of the 37 recipients who showed abnormal DUS findings on POD 1 or 2, the DUS findings were normalized or unchanged thereafter in 33 patients and no vascular interventions were performed. Two patients underwent hepatic artery thrombectomy on POD 2, one patient required a portal vein thrombectomy on POD 1, and one patient died on POD 3 due to bleeding. The overall incidence of vascular complication requiring vascular interventions was 2.5 %. Logistic regression identified abnormal DUS findings on POD 1 or 2 as an independent risk factor of vascular complications requiring intervention.
CONCLUSIONS: In LT recipients who demonstrate normal DUS findings in the first 2 postoperative days, additional DUS screening may have value only when clinically indicated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25123179     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-014-2721-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  20 in total

1.  Vascular complications in hepatic transplantation: single-center experience in 14 years.

Authors:  E Akun; O Yaprak; R Killi; N C Balci; Y Tokat; Y Yuzer
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.066

2.  Hepatic artery thrombosis following orthotopic liver transplantation: a 10-year experience from a single centre in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Michael A Silva; Periyathambi S Jambulingam; Bridget K Gunson; David Mayer; John A C Buckels; Darius F Mirza; Simon R Bramhall
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.799

3.  Use of Doppler sonography for revealing hepatic artery stenosis in liver transplant recipients.

Authors:  J F Platt; G G Yutzy; R O Bude; J H Ellis; J M Rubin
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Effect of protocol Doppler ultrasonography and urgent revascularization on early hepatic artery thrombosis after pediatric liver transplantation.

Authors:  Seigo Nishida; Tomoaki Kato; David Levi; Mittal Naveen; Thierry Berney; Berney Thierry; Rodrigo Vianna; Gennaro Selvaggi; Efren Buitorago; Ahmed Al-Niami; Noboru Nakamura; Anil Vaidya; Jose Nery; Andreas Tzakis
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2002-11

5.  Doppler ultrasound as a screen for hepatic artery thrombosis after liver transplantation.

Authors:  M C Segel; A B Zajko; A Bowen; M L Skolnick; K M Bron; R J Penkrot; B S Slasky; T E Starzl
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  Impact of colour Doppler sonography on detection of thrombosis of the hepatic artery and the portal vein after liver transplantation.

Authors:  A Hellinger; C Roll; A Stracke; J Erhard; F W Eigler
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1996

7.  Hepatic artery stenosis and thrombosis in transplant recipients: Doppler diagnosis with resistive index and systolic acceleration time.

Authors:  G D Dodd; D S Memel; A B Zajko; R L Baron; L A Santaguida
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Hepatic allograft rescue following arterial thrombosis. Role of urgent revascularization.

Authors:  A N Langnas; W Marujo; R J Stratta; R P Wood; S J Li; B W Shaw
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  Resection or transplantation for early hepatocellular carcinoma in a cirrhotic liver: does size define the best oncological strategy?

Authors:  Rene Adam; Prashant Bhangui; Eric Vibert; Daniel Azoulay; Gilles Pelletier; Jean-Charles Duclos-Vallée; Didier Samuel; Catherine Guettier; Denis Castaing
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of prostaglandin E1 in liver transplantation.

Authors:  K S Henley; M R Lucey; D P Normolle; R M Merion; I D McLaren; B A Crider; D S Mackie; V L Shieck; T T Nostrant; K A Brown
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 17.425

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Vascular complications following liver transplantation: A literature review of advances in 2015.

Authors:  Tullio Piardi; Martin Lhuaire; Onorina Bruno; Riccardo Memeo; Patrick Pessaux; Reza Kianmanesh; Daniele Sommacale
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2016-01-08

Review 2.  [Complication management after liver transplantation. Increasing patient safety by standardized approach and interdisciplinary cooperation].

Authors:  P Houben; D N Gotthardt; B Radeleff; P Sauer; M W Büchler; P Schemmer
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Comparison of APACHE IV with APACHE II, SAPS 3, MELD, MELD-Na, and CTP scores in predicting mortality after liver transplantation.

Authors:  Hannah Lee; Susie Yoon; Seung-Young Oh; Jungho Shin; Jeongsoo Kim; Chul-Woo Jung; Ho Geol Ryu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.