H R Kranzler1, K A Sandstrom, J Van Kirk. 1. Alcohol Research Center, Department of Psychiatry, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT 06030-2103, USA. kranzler@psychiatry.uchc.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Previous research has found that alcoholics have a greater preference for sweet solutions than comparison subjects. This study tested the hypothesis that preference for sweet solutions is a marker for alcoholism risk. METHOD: A total of 122 nonalcoholic subjects (59 men) participated. Fifty-eight subjects had a paternal history of alcoholism, and 64 did not. Each subject rated a series of sucrose solutions for intensity of sweetness and degree of preference. RESULTS: Subjects were able to rate accurately the relative intensity of sweetness in the sucrose solutions. Both subjects with and those without a paternal history of alcoholism preferred a 0.42-M sucrose solution, irrespective of gender. CONCLUSIONS: This study failed to support the hypothesis that sweet preference is a marker of alcoholism risk. The sweet preference observed previously among alcoholics may be a consequence of chronic alcohol consumption or other factors associated with heavy drinking.
OBJECTIVE: Previous research has found that alcoholics have a greater preference for sweet solutions than comparison subjects. This study tested the hypothesis that preference for sweet solutions is a marker for alcoholism risk. METHOD: A total of 122 nonalcoholic subjects (59 men) participated. Fifty-eight subjects had a paternal history of alcoholism, and 64 did not. Each subject rated a series of sucrose solutions for intensity of sweetness and degree of preference. RESULTS: Subjects were able to rate accurately the relative intensity of sweetness in the sucrose solutions. Both subjects with and those without a paternal history of alcoholism preferred a 0.42-M sucrose solution, irrespective of gender. CONCLUSIONS: This study failed to support the hypothesis that sweet preference is a marker of alcoholism risk. The sweet preference observed previously among alcoholics may be a consequence of chronic alcohol consumption or other factors associated with heavy drinking.
Authors: Kaziya M Lee; Michal Coehlo; Hadley A McGregor; Ryan S Waltermire; Karen K Szumlinski Journal: Behav Brain Res Date: 2015-06-03 Impact factor: 3.332
Authors: Eric Stice; Dianne P Figlewicz; Blake A Gosnell; Allen S Levine; Wayne E Pratt Journal: Neurosci Biobehav Rev Date: 2012-12-10 Impact factor: 8.989
Authors: James C Garbutt; Michael Osborne; Robert Gallop; John Barkenbus; Kathy Grace; Meghan Cody; Barbara Flannery; Alexey B Kampov-Polevoy Journal: Alcohol Alcohol Date: 2009-02-03 Impact factor: 2.826