P K Chan1, D P Chan, K F To, M Y Yu, J L Cheung, A F Cheng. 1. Department of Microbiology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China. paulkschan@cuhk.edu.hk
Abstract
AIM: To evaluate the efficiency of phenol/chloroform, microwave, and Qiagen spin column based DNA extractions from paraffin wax embedded tissue for use in the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). In addition, to assess the reliability of amplifying a housekeeping gene to indicate successful viral DNA extraction. METHODS: DNA samples extracted from 20 blocks of cervical carcinoma tissues using the three methods were subjected to PCRs targeting 509 bp and 355 bp of the beta globin gene, and 450 bp and 150 bp of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA. RESULTS: Microwave extraction showed the highest positive rate for beta globin PCR, whereas the spin column method was the most efficient for HPV DNA extraction. When the 509 bp beta globin and 450 bp HPV PCR results were correlated, two of 10, eight of 12, and nine of 10 beta globin positive extractions prepared by means of the phenol/chloroform, microwave, and spin column methods, respectively, yielded HPV DNA of the expected size. For the beta globin negative samples, HPV was detected in three of 10, two of eight, and four of 10 samples. CONCLUSIONS: HPV DNA extraction was most efficient using the Qiagen spin column and had the highest positive predictive value when a housekeeping gene was used as an indicator of successful viral DNA extraction; the phenol/chloroform method was the least efficient. The potential drawbacks of some extraction methods when using a human housekeeping gene to assess the quality of viral DNA extraction need to be considered.
AIM: To evaluate the efficiency of phenol/chloroform, microwave, and Qiagen spin column based DNA extractions from paraffin wax embedded tissue for use in the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). In addition, to assess the reliability of amplifying a housekeeping gene to indicate successful viral DNA extraction. METHODS: DNA samples extracted from 20 blocks of cervical carcinoma tissues using the three methods were subjected to PCRs targeting 509 bp and 355 bp of the beta globin gene, and 450 bp and 150 bp of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA. RESULTS: Microwave extraction showed the highest positive rate for beta globin PCR, whereas the spin column method was the most efficient for HPV DNA extraction. When the 509 bp beta globin and 450 bp HPV PCR results were correlated, two of 10, eight of 12, and nine of 10 beta globin positive extractions prepared by means of the phenol/chloroform, microwave, and spin column methods, respectively, yielded HPV DNA of the expected size. For the beta globin negative samples, HPV was detected in three of 10, two of eight, and four of 10 samples. CONCLUSIONS:HPV DNA extraction was most efficient using the Qiagen spin column and had the highest positive predictive value when a housekeeping gene was used as an indicator of successful viral DNA extraction; the phenol/chloroform method was the least efficient. The potential drawbacks of some extraction methods when using a human housekeeping gene to assess the quality of viral DNA extraction need to be considered.
Authors: Amélie Gaignaux; Garry Ashton; Domenico Coppola; Yvonne De Souza; Annemieke De Wilde; James Eliason; William Grizzle; Fiorella Guadagni; Elaine Gunter; Iren Koppandi; Katheryn Shea; Tim Shi; Julie A Stein; Mark E Sobel; Gunnel Tybring; Gert Van den Eynden; Fay Betsou Journal: Biopreserv Biobank Date: 2016-05-19 Impact factor: 2.300
Authors: Mohammad Muzaffar Mir; Javid Ahmad Dar; Nazir Ahmad Dar; A T Syed; Irfana Salam; Ghulam Nabi Lone Journal: Int J Health Sci (Qassim) Date: 2007-07
Authors: W Tulvatana; P Bhattarakosol; L Sansopha; W Sipiyarak; E Kowitdamrong; T Paisuntornsug; S Karnsawai Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: Raya Saab; Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo; Kelly Matmati; Jerold E Rehg; Shannon H Baumer; Joseph D Khoury; Catherine Billups; Geoffrey Neale; Kathleen J Helton; Stephen X Skapek Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2009-01-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Solomon Jo; Agnes Juhasz; Keqiang Zhang; Christopher Ruel; Sofia Loera; Sharon P Wilczynski; Yun Yen; Xiyong Liu; Joshua Ellenhorn; Dean Lim; Benjamin Paz; George Somlo; Nayana Vora; Stephen Shibata Journal: Anticancer Res Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 2.480
Authors: Jennifer L Hunt; Leon Barnes; James S Lewis; Magdy E Mahfouz; Pieter J Slootweg; Lester D R Thompson; Antonio Cardesa; Kenneth O Devaney; Douglas R Gnepp; William H Westra; Juan P Rodrigo; Julia A Woolgar; Alessandra Rinaldo; Asterios Triantafyllou; Robert P Takes; Alfio Ferlito Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2013-03-07 Impact factor: 2.503