| Literature DB >> 11325368 |
G Theodoratos1, A Papanikolaou, E Apergis, J Maris.
Abstract
We present our experience of intramedullary nailing (IM) and external fixation in the treatment of 54 patients with ipsilateral diaphyseal fractures of the femur and tibia. Eight femoral and 24 tibial fractures were open. They were classified into three groups: IM nailing of both fractures (group A, 19 patients); IM nailing of the femoral and external fixation of the tibial fracture (group B, eight patients); and external fixation of both fractures (group C, 27 patients). In group C (which included all but one grade III open fracture), two patients died and four underwent amputation. Femoral fractures treated with external fixation had significantly more complications and reoperations than those treated with IM nailing. In tibial fractures this difference was also present but not statistically significant. We believe that IM nailing is the method of choice for femoral fractures and is preferable for tibial fractures, with the exception probably of grade III B and C open injuries.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2001 PMID: 11325368 DOI: 10.1016/s0020-1383(00)00189-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Injury ISSN: 0020-1383 Impact factor: 2.586