Literature DB >> 11325121

Suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and hearing threshold.

M Pienkowski1, H Kunov.   

Abstract

A distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) suppression tuning curve (STC) shows the minimum level of suppressor tone that is required to reduce DPOAE level by a fixed amount, as a function of suppressor frequency. Several years ago, Mills [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103, 507-523 (1998)] derived, theoretically, an approximately linear relationship between the tip-to-tail suppressor level difference on a DPOAE STC, and the gain of the cochlear amplifier, defined as the maximum increase in the active over the passive basilar membrane (BM) response. In this paper, preliminary data from adult human subjects are presented that establish a correlation between this tip-to-tail DPOAE STC difference and the threshold of hearing, the latter measured at the frequency of the f2 primary tone. Assuming that both suppression and the DPOAE are by-products of active, nonlinear BM dynamics, the above result suggests that threshold elevation in mild levels of hearing loss may be attributed, in part, to a reduction of cochlear amplifier gain, which is detectable with the suppression paradigm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11325121     DOI: 10.1121/1.1354202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  7 in total

1.  An alternate approach to constructing distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) suppression tuning curves.

Authors:  Tiffany A Johnson; Stephen T Neely; Darcia M Dierking; Brenda M Hoover; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission suppression tuning in humans: comparison to behavioral tuning.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Pamela Souza; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-09-07

3.  Distortion-product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves in hearing-impaired humans.

Authors:  Alyson Gruhlke; Cori Birkholz; Stephen T Neely; Judy Kopun; Hongyang Tan; Walt Jesteadt; Kendra Schmid; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Two-tone suppression of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; John C Ellison; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  On a possible prognostic value of otoacoustic emissions: a study on patients with sudden hearing loss.

Authors:  Sebastian Hoth
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2004-05-05       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning and acoustic admittance in human infants: birth through 6 months.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Douglas H Keefe; Sandra I Oba
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 7.  Auditory cortical plasticity in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Erin Glennon; Mario A Svirsky; Robert C Froemke
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 6.627

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.