Literature DB >> 11324839

Human auditory steady-state responses to tones independently modulated in both frequency and amplitude.

A Dimitrijevic1, M S John, P van Roon, T W Picton.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Independent amplitude and frequency modulation (IAFM) of a carrier tone uses two different modulating frequencies, one for amplitude modulation (AM) and one for frequency modulation (FM). This study measured the human steady-state responses to multiple IAFM tones. The first question was whether the IAFM responses could be recorded without attenuation of the AM and FM components. The second question was whether IAFM stimuli would provide a more effective demonstration of responses at intensities near threshold than the responses to AM tones. The third question was whether the responses to multiple IAFM stimuli would relate to the discrimination of words at different intensities.
DESIGN: Multiple AM, FM, or IAFM stimuli were presented simultaneously. Responses were recorded between the vertex and the neck and analysed in the frequency domain. The first experiment compared IAFM responses with AM and FM responses. The second experiment compared IAFM responses with AM responses between intensities 20 to 50 dB SPL. The third experiment related the IAFM responses to the discrimination of monosyllabic words at intensities between 20 and 70 dB SPL.
RESULTS: Steady-state responses to the individual component of the IAFM stimuli were clearly recognizable although attenuated a little (14%) from the responses to AM or FM alone. Using IAFM stimuli was not different than simply using AM stimuli when trying to recognize responses at low intensities. The number of responses detected during multiple IAFM stimulation and the amplitudes of these responses correlated significantly with word discrimination.
CONCLUSIONS: IAFM of a carrier using two different modulating frequencies (one for AM and one for FM) elicits separate AM and FM responses that are relatively independent of each other. These separate responses can be used to detect whether a particular carrier has been processed in the cochlea, but they are not as effective as measuring responses to carriers that have been modulated in both amplitude and frequency at the same modulation frequency (mixed modulation). The detectability of eight different responses (four AM and four FM) to an IAFM stimuli relates well to the ability of subjects to discriminate words. IAFM stimuli therefore show promise as an objective test for assessing suprathreshold hearing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11324839     DOI: 10.1097/00003446-200104000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  9 in total

1.  [Auditory steady-state response. On the threshold of clinical usage?].

Authors:  R Mühler
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Improved electrically evoked auditory steady-state response thresholds in humans.

Authors:  Michael Hofmann; Jan Wouters
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-05-09

3.  Neural representations of complex temporal modulations in the human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Nai Ding; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Separable developmental trajectories for the abilities to detect auditory amplitude and frequency modulation.

Authors:  Karen Banai; Andrew T Sabin; Beverly A Wright
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Sustained envelope periodicity representations are associated with speech-in-noise performance in difficult listening conditions for younger and older adults.

Authors:  Carolyn M McClaskey; James W Dias; Kelly C Harris
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Fast hearing-threshold estimation using multiple auditory steady-state responses with narrow-band chirps and adaptive stimulus patterns.

Authors:  Roland Mühler; Katrin Mentzel; Jesko Verhey
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-04-24

7.  Using auditory steady-state responses for measuring hearing protector occlusion effect.

Authors:  Olivier Valentin; Frédéric Laville
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2017 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 0.867

8.  Using Auditory Steady-State Responses for Measuring Hearing Protector Attenuation.

Authors:  Olivier Valentin; Sasha M John; Frédéric Laville
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 0.867

9.  Aging Affects Neural Synchronization to Speech-Related Acoustic Modulations.

Authors:  Tine Goossens; Charlotte Vercammen; Jan Wouters; Astrid van Wieringen
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 5.750

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.